Sex Differences in Motor Unit Properties and Force Steadiness: Insights from Strength-Matched Elbow Flexion
Alaei, P.; Larocque, K. A.; Kim, C.; Jakobi, J.
Show abstract
Sex-related differences in force steadiness are often attributed to maximal strength and motor unit (MU) properties, but their independent contributions remain unclear. This study strength-matched females and males to remove the influence of maximal strength and determine whether MU properties are associated with sex-related differences in force steadiness. Twelve young adults (6 females) were matched for elbow flexion strength (females, 188.6{+/-}15.6 N; males, 199.7{+/-}24.8 N, p=0.4). Both groups performed submaximal isometric elbow flexion contractions at 2.5%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 25% MVC. The MU recruitment thresholds (RT), discharge rates (MUDR), and coefficient of variation of interspike intervals (CVISI) were measured from intramuscular fine wire electromyography (EMG) electrodes. Force steadiness was quantified as the standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of force. Across forces, SD and CV of force did not differ between females and males (p>0.05). Females had a higher recruitment threshold than males (p<0.05). Females had higher MUDR at 15% and 25% MVC (p<0.02), while males were higher at 5% MVC (p=0.02). The CVISI was greater in females (p<0.001) and positively correlated with SD of force (r=0.2) and negatively with CV of force (r=-0.2) in females and males. When strength was matched, sex-related differences in force steadiness were not evident. However, females exhibited higher MU recruitment thresholds, MUDR and CVISI. Despite greater CVISI in females, these differences did not translate into greater force fluctuations, suggesting that individual MU discharge variability is not a primary predictor of force steadiness when maximal strength is controlled. NEW & NOTEWORTHYO_LIStrength matching eliminated sex-related differences in elbow flexor force steadiness. C_LIO_LIFemales achieved similar force steadiness using higher MU recruitment thresholds and discharge rates, particularly in the short head of the biceps brachii. C_LIO_LIIn females, the greater variability in motor unit discharge was not associated with reduced force steadiness. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-session measures of quadriceps neuromuscular function are reliable in healthy females and unaffected by age 95%
- Perception of effort during an isometric contraction is influenced by prior muscle lengthening or shortening 95%
- Differential changes in the effective neural drive following new motor skill acquisition between vastus lateralis and medialis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of An Inverted Seated Position with Upper Arm Blood Flow Restriction on Measures of Elbow Flexors Neuromuscular Performance 95%
- A comparative analysis of co-contraction indices using synthetic EMG data: Implications for selection and interpretation 93%
- Muscle oxygenation maintained during repeated sprints despite inspiratory muscle loading 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Motor unit dysregulation following 15 days of unilateral lower limb immobilisation 96%
- Acute intermittent hypoxia-induced increases maximal motor unit discharge rates in people with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury 95%
- Facilitation-inhibition control of motor neuronal persistent inward currents in young and older adults 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Isometric handgrip contraction increases tibialis anterior intrinsic motoneuron excitability in a dose-dependent manner 95%
- Training induced improvements in knee extensor force accuracy are associated with reduced vastus lateralis motor unit firing variability 95%
- Ultrasonographic measurements of fascicle length overestimate adaptations in serial sarcomere number 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.