Age-corrected model for predicting pupil diameter in real-world conditions from melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance
Spitschan, M.
Show abstract
PurposePupil diameter in daily life depends on both the light reaching the eye and the observers age, but established prediction formulas require laboratory quantities that are rarely measured in natural environments. We developed a compact age-corrected model that predicts pupil diameter from melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance (mEDI). MethodsWe used an existing field dataset in which binocular pupil diameter and near-corneal spectral irradiance were recorded while 83 adults aged 18-87 years moved through indoor and outdoor environments. The analysis included 10,082 valid paired observations. We fitted a bounded sigmoid relating pupil diameter to mEDI and age, with each participant given equal influence, and assessed prediction in participants excluded from model fitting. Performance was compared with simpler models, a flexible generalised additive model (GAM), and Watson-Yellott predictions based on assumed field geometry. ResultsPupil diameter decreased smoothly as mEDI increased. Age primarily reduced the difference between pupils in dim and bright conditions, by 0.768 mm per decade, while the predicted bright-light diameter changed little with age. In held-out participants, the bounded model had a participant-balanced root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.630 mm and mean absolute error of 0.537 mm. The GAM had a slightly lower point-estimate RMSE of 0.610 mm, but the difference was small and uncertain. The bounded model outperformed the tested log-linear, reduced, age-only, and Watson-Yellott alternatives. ConclusionAge and mEDI are sufficient to provide useful population-average pupil predictions across the observed adult age and real-world light range. The model is transparent, physiologically bounded, and nearly as accurate as a flexible GAM, but predictions approaching darkness remain uncertain because valid mEDI measurements were not available in that range. Key pointsO_LIA compact equation predicts population-average pupil diameter from age and mEDI alone. C_LIO_LIAge mainly compresses the pupils response range by reducing pupil diameter under dimmer conditions. C_LIO_LIPrediction error in unseen participants was close to that of a flexible GAM, without requiring a fitted smooth object. C_LIO_LIThe model is intended for the observed adult age and field-light range, not for extrapolation into darkness. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Spectral dependency of the human pupillary light reflex. Influences of pre-adaptation and chronotype. 94%
- Abrupt light transitions in illuminance and CCT result in different temporal dynamics and interindividual variability for sensation, comfort and alertness 93%
- Did you see it? A Python tool for psychophysical assessment of the human blind spot 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early detection of retinal alteration by visible and near-infrared optical coherence tomography (vnOCT) in a dexamethasone-induced ocular hypertension mouse model 87%
- Investigating the effect of channel pruning on functional near-infrared spectroscopy data collected from children aged 5-24 months 86%
- Portable Six-Channel Laser Speckle System for Simultaneous Cerebral Blood Flow and Volume Measurement with Potential Application for Characterization of Brain Injury 86%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.