An Open Demonstrator for an Interoperable Clinical Decision Support System for the Detection of Systemic Inflammation and Sepsis in Pediatric Intensive Care
Schack, M.; Rathert, H.; Boehnke, J.; Ruebsamen, N.; Bode, L.; Karch, A.; Almekkawi, M. K.; Marschollek, M.; Beerbaum, P.; Wulff, A.; Jack, T.
Show abstract
Background: Sepsis is a life-threatening condition triggered by infection and associated with dysregulated immune response of the patient followed often by multiorgan dysfunction or failure. In the clinical evolution of sepsis towards organ dysfunction, early initiation of a suited therapy significantly increases patient outcomes and reduces mortality rates. Since electronic health records provide data in a machine-readable format, this process could be supported by computerized systems. Methods: We developed an interoperable, time-sensitive CDSS that able to detect systemic inflammation and the different classifications of sepsis (bacterial/viral, suspected/proven, on admission/PICU acquired) in pediatric patients based on the analysis of routine clinical data. This application is provided as part of this publication as an open demonstrator (web application), and the usability and accuracy of the CDSS is shown by a retrospective creation of sepsis outcome labels for a routine data set of 4,655 pediatric patients. As a reference standard, the patients were manually assessed by blinded clinical experts. Results: In comparison with the reference standard, the CDSS achieved sensitivity of 96.9% (95% CI: 80.9-99.6%) and specificity of 99.1% (95% CI: 95.1-99.8%). In the context of a sepsis outcome labeling for 4,655 patients, the CDSS detected 4,342 episodes of inflammation of which 1,723 were classified as sepsis. Conclusions: We demonstrated that our routine-data based CDSS is able to perform a complex sepsis detection process with high diagnostic accuracy. Such CDSS with the ability to differentiate between SIRS, sepsis on admission, suspected and proven sepsis can prospectively support clinical management, monitoring and quality management.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Detecting Rare Diseases in Electronic Health Records Using Machine Learning and Knowledge Engineering: Case Study of Acute Hepatic Porphyria 93%
- A Model of Workflow in the Hospital During a Pandemic to Assist Management 92%
- tbiExtractor: A framework for Extracting Traumatic Brain Injury Common Data Elements from Radiology Reports 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Syndromic Surveillance Tool to Detect Anomalous Clusters of COVID-19 Symptoms in the United States 92%
- Systematic identification of rare disease patients in electronic health records enables evaluation of clinical outcomes 92%
- A Cross-sectional Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Usability and Efficacy of “Swaasa”: An AI-Platform for Rapid Respiratory Health Assessment 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing and validating an explainable digital mortality prediction tool for extremely preterm infants 93%
- Machine Learning for Paediatric Related Decision Support in Emergency Care - A UK and Ireland Network Survey Study 93%
- External validation of a paediatric SMART triage model for use in resource limited facilities 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Synthetic Data Generation in Healthcare: A Scoping Review of reviews on domains, motivations, and future applications 92%
- Image and structured data analysis for prognostication of health outcomes in patients presenting to the Emergency Department during the COVID-19 pandemic 92%
- Predicting mortality in SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) positive patients in the inpatient setting using a Novel Deep Neural Network 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning Based Clinical Decision Support System for Early COVID-19 Mortality Prediction 92%
- Evaluation of a clinical decision support system for detection of patients at risk after kidney transplantation 91%
- Bigger and Better? Representativeness of the Influenza A surveillance using one consolidated clinical microbiology laboratory data set as compared to the Belgian Sentinel Network of Laboratories 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.