Back

Prevalence, Hallmark-Based Mechanisms, and Risk Factors of Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Datta, D.; Saha, D.; Ghosh, R.; Baidya, A.; Ganguli, B.; Hui, S. P.

2026-08-04 neurology
10.64898/2026.08.02.26359538 medRxiv
Show abstract

This systematic review and meta-analysis has several major aims, including evaluation of global and continent wise prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathies (DPNs), a detail assessment of DPN associated risk factors and most importantly to explore mechanistic basis of DPN by capturing its different pathophysiological hallmarks Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) imposes a substantial global burden, yet its mechanistic underpinnings and integrated risk architecture remain incompletely characterized. This systematic review and meta-analysis of 74 studies across 24 countries (83,560 participants) provides the most comprehensive quantitative synthesis of DPN prevalence, hallmark-based pathogenesis, and multi-covariate risk profiling to date. The global pooled DPN prevalence was 57.42% (95% CI: 48.56 to 66.05), with continent-specific gradients: Americas (74.52%), Europe (59.95%), and Asia (45.44%). Hallmark stratified subgroup analyses encompassing neuronal damage, metabolic dysregulation, neuroinflammation, and microvascular alteration identified microvascular alteration as the sole statistically significant mechanistic determinant (Q = 15.78, p = 0.0004), with prevalence escalating monotonically from 53% to 92% across increasing hallmark severity scores, constituting a compelling dose response relationship. Risk factor meta analysis of 27 covariates identified 12 significant determinants, including the novel meta analytic confirmation of peripheral vascular disease (OR: 3.70; highest effect size), male sex (OR: 1.52), and height (OR: 1.26) as independent DPN risk factors. Notably, HbA1c, BMI, and blood pressure were nonsignificant, challenging glycemia-centric paradigms. These findings collectively support a precision medicine framework grounded in hallmark stratified phenotyping and mechanism-targeted pharmacotherapy for DPN.

Matching journals

The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.