Back

Vitamin D Status and Supplementation in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Fahim, F.; Vosoughian, F.; Mojtahedzadeh, A.; Rakhshani, M.; Mahdavi, B.; taghipoor, K.; Rostami, R.; Qahremani, R.; Gheibi, F.; Deldar, F.; Shemshadigolafzani, R.; Rezaali, S.; Badavi, N.; Fathabadi, P.; Zali, A.

2026-08-04 neurology
10.64898/2026.08.02.26359512 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Vitamin D may influence bone healing and recovery after spine surgery, but its clinical effects remain uncertain. Objective To evaluate clinical, functional, and bone-related outcomes associated with vitamin D status and supplementation in patients undergoing spine surgery. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261467482) and reported according to PRISMA 2020. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception through 1 June 2026. Random-effects meta-analyses used mean differences (MDs) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RRs) for dichotomous outcomes. Direct supplementation analyses were prioritized, while analyses combining supplementation, baseline vitamin D status, or co-interventions were considered exploratory. Risk of bias was assessed using design-specific Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Results Thirteen studies were included. Four supplementation studies involving 177 participants showed no significant reduction in postoperative pain (MD -0.82, 95% CI -2.50 to 0.86; I2 = 84.3%). Three studies involving 277 participants showed lower Oswestry Disability Index scores in an exploratory analysis (MD -6.40, 95% CI -10.41 to -2.39; I2 = 96.8%). Three supplementation studies involving 128 participants showed no significant improvement in fusion rate (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.74; I2 = 31.5%). An exploratory four-study fusion analysis was also not statistically significant (RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.57; I2 = 45.5%). Conclusion Current evidence does not establish that vitamin D supplementation independently improves postoperative pain or fusion rates after spine surgery. Possible benefits for disability and other bone-related outcomes remain uncertain because of small study numbers, heterogeneity, co-interventions, and residual confounding. Larger randomized trials stratified by baseline vitamin D status are needed.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.