Preventing aspiration events in hospital using prophylactic antiemetics: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction Aspiration events in hospitalized adults are common and linked to substantial morbidity, mortality, and healthcare burden. While antiemetics have been studied for aspiration prevention in specific settings, evidence for their broader preventive use in hospitalized adults is limited. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of prophylactic scheduled antiemetics on aspiration events in adult inpatients. Methods: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library (via Wiley) were searched in May 2025. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies assessing prophylactic scheduled antiemetic use in hospitalized adults, with aspiration events as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were aspiration pneumonia, hospital length of stay, increased oxygen requirement, ICU admission, and mortality. Two investigators screened and independently extracted data in duplicate using standardized data collection forms. Extracted information included study characteristics, patient demographics and clinical characteristics, interventions, and outcomes. Results: Three RCTs met inclusion criteria (n = 515 patients; 237 antiemetic, 278 placebo). Pooled analysis of two RCTs demonstrated an 88% relative risk [RR] reduction of aspiration events; (2.8% [3/106] prophylactic antiemetic vs 27.9% [29/104] placebo; RR = 0.12, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.02-0.73, p <0.0001, low certainty) in the antiemetic group. Pneumonia rates were also lower in the antiemetic group although they did not reach statistical significance (16.5% vs 32.4%; RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.15-1.28, P = 0.13, low certainty). ICU admission rates were lower in the antiemetic group (2.6% [2/76]) vs. placebo (23% [17/74]); RR = 0.11, 95% CI: 0.03-0.48, p=0.003, very low certainty). Mortality was similar between groups (35.0% vs 38.1%; RR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.84-1.24, P = 0.85, low certainty). No adverse events were reported among all studies. Conclusion: Prophylactic scheduled antiemetics were associated with a significant reduction in aspiration and ICU admission. There was a non-significant but favorable trend towards reduction of pneumonia among hospitalized adults. Larger, high-quality trials are needed to clarify their role in aspiration prevention.