Public Preferences for End-of-Life Timing in Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias
Dennelly, L.; Thomas, Z.; McAndrew, T. C.; Davis, D.
Show abstract
Alzheimers Disease and Related Dementias (ADRD) impacts 7 million people in the US over the age of 65, costing $360B in reimbursable care and $347B in unpaid care annually. ADRD is a salient health issue, being the most feared medical condition in the US and surpassing a fear of cancer. Despite this concern, there is almost no data about how Americans view their future lives if they receive an ADRD diagnosis. To investigate US preferences for end-of-life if given an ADRD diagnosis, 1,015 participants reviewed four vignettes of people in different stages of Alzheimer's disease, each of whom eventually experiences a fatal heart attack. Participants were then asked: if they were given an ADRD diagnosis then which person would they hope to be? We found that 75% of participants would choose for their life to end in the early stages of ADRD. Factors associated with a hope of later ADRD stages were race (OR = 1.9; 95CI = [1.1, 3.3]; p = 0.02; Black vs White, Non-hispanic) and education level (OR = 2.7; 95CI = [1.2, 5.7]; p = 0.01; Less than high school vs College). Of the majority who would choose for their life to end in the early stages of ADRD, we used Latent Dirichlet Allocation to find that the most representative rationales given were to prevent burdening their family and loved ones with their care as well as emphasizing their own quality of life (rather than longevity alone) as important. Current medical practice focuses on patient longevity as an important marker of success and progress in treatments of many diseases. However, our work here shows that for ADRD the focus of medical practice and the wishes of patients may not be aligned. For people with a diagnosis of ADRD, longevity may not be what they are hoping for.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam COVID-19 exposure index: a cross-sectional analysis of the impact of the pandemic on daily functioning of older adults 94%
- The impact of patient-centered care on quality of life and hope among patients receiving home medical care: The Zaitaku Evaluative Initiatives and Outcome Study 93%
- Digital Health Technologies for Metabolic Disorders in Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Randomized Clinical Trial of ICECaP (Individualized Coordination and Empowerment for Care Partners of Persons with Dementia): Primary Mental Health and Burden Outcomes 94%
- Life expectancy, quality of life, and hope among Japanese patients receiving home medical care 93%
- The Healthy Brain Initiative (HBI): A prospective cohort study protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Machine Learning and Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data for the Early Prediction of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias 94%
- Potentially Modifiable Dementia Risk Factors in Canada: An Analysis of Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging with a Multi-Country Comparison 93%
- Representation of Racial and Ethnic Minority Populations in Dementia Prevention Trials: A Systematic Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Qualitative Study of People with Alzheimer’s Disease in a Memory Clinic Considering Lecanemab Treatment 94%
- Non-pharmaceutical interventions for persons living with young-onset dementia and their informal caregivers: a systematic review with meta-analysis 92%
- Racial Composition in K-12 Schooling and Cognitive Health of Older Black Adults 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.