Back

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and healthcare use in older adults with heart failure and obesity

Acheampong, C.; Bowe, A.; Hames, A.; Diaz, M.; Hayes, M.; Poonawalla, I.

2026-07-27 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.07.24.26358897 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) are indicated for weight reduction and offer cardiometabolic health benefits, yet there is little real-world evidence regarding their association with healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs for Medicare Advantage (MA) beneficiaries with heart failure and obesity. Methods: We used a prevalent new-user study design and the Humana Healthcare Research database to identify MA beneficiaries with heart failure (HF) and obesity receiving standard HF therapy or HF therapy + newly initiating GLP-1 RA between January 1, 2022, and December 31, 2023. We observed adjusted, one-year mean difference in all-cause and heart failure-related HCRU. Results: In our cohort of 4,677 matched pairs (mean age 72 years, male: 41%), one-year, adjusted risk ratio (RR) for HF therapy + GLP-1 RA vs HF therapy was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84 ? 0.93) for all-cause inpatient utilization, 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82 ? 0.94) for avoidable hospitalizations, and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.95 ? 1.03) for emergency department visits. For individuals receiving HF therapy + GLP-1 RA vs HF therapy, the mean difference was 30.6% (95% CI: 26.7% ?34.7%) for all-cause total costs, 105.9% (95% CI: 99.1% ?112.9%) for pharmacy costs, and ?4.7% (95% CI: ?8.7% to ?0.6%) for medical costs. HF-related HCRU measures were lower among beneficiaries augmenting HF therapy with GLP 1 RA vs individuals receiving HF therapy alone. Conclusions: Among MA beneficiaries with heart failure and obesity, the addition of GLP-1 RA to standard heart failure therapy reduced the likelihood of inpatient admissions or avoidable hospitalizations compared with HF therapy alone.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.