Association Between Out-of-Hospital Falls and Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Deng, C.; Men, Y.; Xu, X.; Pang, Y.; Tang, Z.; Ren, H.; Cui, W.; Hou, J.; Muyesaier, M.; Chen, Z.; Chen, H.; Wu, T.-T.
Show abstract
Background Falls are increasingly recognized as adverse events in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients, yet their prognostic implications remain incompletely understood. This study examined the independent associations of falls with mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events, and the roles of functional status and frailty in these relationships. Methods This retrospective cohort study enrolled 2,139 CHD patients with median follow-up of 36 months. Falls were ascertained via telephone interviews every 3 months. Primary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). Secondary outcomes comprised all-cause and cardiac mortality. Multivariable Cox models with stepwise adjustment for functional status indicators were constructed, with subgroup analyses stratified by frailty status. Results During follow-up, 171 patients (8.0%) experienced falls. Falls were associated with mortality in univariate analysis but not after adjusting for functional status, indicating mediation by functional decline. In contrast, falls remained independently associated with MACE (HR=1.73, 95%CI: 1.17-2.57, P=0.006) and MACCE (HR=1.67, 95%CI: 1.14-2.46, P=0.009) in fully adjusted models. Frailty significantly modified this association (P for interaction <0.001). Among robust patients, falls conferred substantially elevated risk (MACE: HR=4.08, 95%CI: 2.37-7.01; MACCE: HR=3.94, 95%CI: 2.30-6.76), whereas no significant association was observed in pre-frail or frail patients. Conclusions Falls independently predict long-term MACE and MACCE in CHD patients, with mortality effects mediated by functional status. Frailty significantly modifies the fall-cardiovascular event relationship--robust patients experiencing falls face substantially elevated cardiovascular risk and warrant comprehensive evaluation. These findings support integrating fall history into cardiovascular risk assessment and implementing frailty-stratified management.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Olfactory impairment and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in older adults 94%
- Carotid Intima-media thickness, carotid distensibility and incident heart failure in older men: The British Regional Heart Study 94%
- Social Networks and Cardiovascular Disease Events in the Jackson Heart Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining Health Service Rates Among Residents of Retirement Homes and Other Older Adult Populations in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Cohort Study 91%
- Ticagrelor Compared to Clopidogrel in aCute Coronary syndromes (TC4) – A Bayesian pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial 88%
- Risk factors for retirement home COVID-19 outbreaks in Ontario, Canada: A population-level cohort study 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal associations of sustained low or high income and income variability with incident cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective population-based cohort study 92%
- Clinical presentation, disease course and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease – a cohort study across sixteen countries 92%
- Hypoferremia reduces long-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular events after STEMI by averting the myocardial reactive iron storm 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions 93%
- Risk of Cardiovascular Events after Covid-19: a double-cohort study 92%
- Association of left atrial structure and function with cognitive function among adults with metabolic syndrome 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.