Plasma Metabolite Associations with Incident Heart Failure with Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction
Chebrolu, B.; Choksi, P.; Carbone, S.; Weber, B. N.; Lasky-Su, J.; Karlson, E. W.; Hegde, S. M.; Buckley, L. F.
Show abstract
Background: Prior studies on metabolite associations with incident heart failure (HF) used billing code-based definitions and lacked the data on left ventricular ejection fraction needed to determine associations with HF with reduced (HFrEF) and preserved (HFpEF) ejection fraction. Objectives: Identify potentially causal plasma metabolite associations with HFrEF and HFpEF, ascertained using a validated machine learning- and natural language processing-based algorithm, in up to 38,000 individuals. Methods: We included MGB Biobank participants who had available metabolomics data and no history of HF at baseline. The primary exposures were plasma levels of 42 metabolites measured using a H1 nuclear magnetic resonance platform. The primary outcome was incident HF, ascertained by a validated machine learning- and natural language processing-based algorithm. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to quantify the associations between a 1-SD difference in metabolite level and the time to incident HF. Mendelian randomization analysis was used test the potential causality of each metabolite-HF association. Results: The final analytical cohort included 38,628 individuals with a mean age of 63 years (56% women). Higher plasma levels of glutamine associated with a higher risk of incident HF (HR [95% CI]: 1.21 [1.07-1.35]) while higher levels of docosahexaenoic acid (an omega-3 fatty acid) (0.85 [0.75-0.95]), phosphatidylcholines (0.85 [0.75-0.97]), phosphoglycerides (0.86 [0.76-0.97]) and total cholines (0.85 [0.75-0.97]) associated with a lower HF risk. Docosahexaenoic acid and total omega-3 fatty acids associated with HFpEF. Associations with HFpEF tended to be stronger than with HFrEF for several fatty acids, including omega-3 fatty acids, in individuals with obesity, but not coronary artery disease or diabetes. Mendelian randomization analysis supported causal associations between higher levels of docosahexaenoic acid and omega-3 fatty acids with a higher risk of HF and greater left ventricular mass index. Conclusions: Dysregulated omega-3 fatty acid metabolism may be causally associated with a higher risk of incident HFpEF.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High Variability of Body Mass Index Independently Associated with Incident Heart Failure 95%
- Development and validation of imaging-free myocardial fibrosis prediction models, association with outcomes, and sample size estimation for phase 3 trials 95%
- PFKFB2 is Pivotal for Metabolic Flexibility and Differential Glucose Utilization 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Aptamer Proteomics for Biomarker Discovery in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction 97%
- Genetically Predicted IL-18 Inhibition and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Mendelian Randomization Study 94%
- Right Ventricular Sarcomere Contractile Depression and the Role of Thick Filament Activation in Human Heart Failure with Pulmonary Hypertension 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolomic profile for understanding heart failure classifications 93%
- Left ventricular mass and global wall thickness – prognostic utility and characterization of left ventricular hypertrophy 93%
- Two-hit mouse model of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction combining diet-induced obesity and renin-mediated hypertension 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impaired mitochondrial ketone body oxidation in insulin resistant states 92%
- Integrating multi-modal omics to identify therapeutic atherosclerosis pathways for coronary heart disease 91%
- Distinct metabolic features of genetic liability to type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease: a reverse Mendelian randomization study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.