Renal Outcomes of Staged Versus Concomitant Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The optimal timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unclear, particularly regarding its impact on renal outcomes. Methods: We conducted systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing staged versus concomitant PCI in patients with aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease undergoing TAVR. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases comprehensively. Using a random-effects model, we calculated odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to assess the incidence of contrast-induced acute coronary injury (CI-AKI) across different stages. Results: The analysis included 11 studies encompassing 7,119 patients. Overall, staged PCI did not significantly differ from concomitant PCI in reducing CI-AKI (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.53 to 1.98; p = 0.959; Figure 2A). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences in stage 1 (OR 1.99; 95% CI 0.38 to 10.47; p = 0.417; Figure 2B) or stage 2 CI-AKI (OR 1.01; 95% CI 0.39 to 2.64; p = 0.978; Figure 2C). However, a statistically significant difference emerged for stage 3/4 CI-AKI, favoring the staged approach (OR 0.48; 95% CI 0.24 to 0.99; p = 0.046; Figure 2D). Conclusion: While staged PCI does not consistently reduce CI-AKI in patients undergoing TAVR, it may offer potential benefits for more severe kidney injury (stages 3/4). Given the observed heterogeneity, large-scale randomized controlled trials are essential to establish the relationship between procedural timing and renal outcomes.