Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI Radiomics for Predicting KRAS Mutation in Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Saleh, M. M.; Hegazy, M.; Alsaied, M. A.; Elkenani, A. J.; Ehab, R.; Hesham, M.; Abdelrazek, H. M.; Nazemi, S.; Shalaby, M.; El-Hussuna, A.
Show abstract
Background: KRAS mutation status is an important biomarker in rectal cancer, with implications for prognosis and treatment response. MRI-based radiomics has emerged as a non-invasive approach for predicting tumor genotypes. However, the diagnostic performance of MRI radiomics for predicting KRAS mutation status remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI radiomics for predicting KRAS mutations in rectal cancer. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed through July 2025. Diagnostic test accuracy studies evaluating MRI-based radiomics or artificial intelligence models for predicting KRAS mutation status in adult patients with rectal cancer were included, using molecular testing as the reference standard. Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were estimated using a bivariate random-effects model. Results: Seven studies involving 1,224 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity was 0.736 (95% CI: 0.697-0.772) and the pooled specificity was 0.645 (95% CI: 0.586-0.701). The false positive rate was 0.355 (95% CI: 0.299-0.414). The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.754, with a normalized partial AUC of 0.666. Between-study heterogeneity ranged from low to moderate depending on the estimation method (I2 = 8.4%-53.3%). Conclusion: MRI radiomics demonstrates moderate diagnostic accuracy for predicting KRAS mutation status in rectal cancer and may serve as a promising non-invasive biomarker for preoperative molecular stratification. Further large-scale studies with external validation are required to confirm its clinical utility.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Detection of local microvascular proliferation in IDH wild-type Glioblastoma using relative Cerebral Blood Volume 93%
- Radiomic-Based Approaches in the Multi-metastatic Setting: A Quantitative Review 93%
- Study Protocol of A Phase II Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Neo-adjuvant Pembrolizumab and Radiotherapy in Localized Rectal Cancer 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 93%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 92%
- Diagnostic value of circulating tumor DNA as an effective biomarker in cervical cancer: a meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of Graph-based Spatial Features with Overall Survival Status of Glioblastoma Patients 92%
- Developing a Fully Automated Imaging Biomarker for HCC Risk Assessment via MRI-Based Tumor Segmentation and EPM 91%
- Prediction of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula using radiomic features and preoperative data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of oncogene mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis with a special focus on artificial-intelligence-based methods 92%
- Impact of Non-Contrast Enhanced Imaging Input Sequences on the Generation of Virtual Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI Scans using Neural Networks 92%
- Predicting EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma presenting as ground-glass opacity: utilizing radiomics model in clinical translation 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated Tumor Segmentation and Brain Tissue Extraction from Multiparametric MRI of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Study 92%
- Early prognostication of overall survival for pediatric diffuse midline gliomas using MRI radiomics and machine learning 92%
- Pediatric brain tumor classification using deep learning on MR-images with age fusion 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.