Back

The Role of Parenting in Mitigating Epigenetic Cardiometabolic Risk in a Sample of Predominantly Latino Preschoolers

Lopez, A.; Merrill, S. M.; Bozack, A. K.; Cardenas, A.; Comer, J. S.; Bagner, D. M.; Highlander, A.; Parent, J.

2026-07-20 pediatrics
10.64898/2026.07.17.26358350 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Childhood obesity is a prevalent public health concern, particularly among children from marginalized backgrounds. Epigenomic mechanisms, including DNA methylation (DNAm), offer insight into the biological embedding of metabolic risk, yet protective family-level factors remain understudied. This study examined whether participation in a positive parenting intervention was associated with reduced epigenetic cardiometabolic risk among preschool-aged children. Methods: Participants were 74 children (n = 35 intervention; n = 39 services-as-usual; mean age = 36 months). Using a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial, DNAm-derived body mass index (BMI) and anthropometric BMI were assessed at baseline and 12-month follow-up, and parenting practices were observed post-treatment. Results: Children in the intervention group demonstrated significantly lower DNAm BMI at 12 months relative to controls, adjusting for child sex, race and/or ethnicity, and anthropometric BMI. No treatment effect was observed for anthropometric BMI, and DNAm BMI was not associated with anthropometric BMI at 12 months. Although parenting practices improved, they did not mediate intervention effects on DNAm-derived BMI. Conclusions: Parenting interventions may influence biological pathways related to cardiometabolic risk, even before changes in anthropometric outcomes, underscoring the potential of family-centered approaches to promote early metabolic health.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.