Back

Personality Traits, Trust, and Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Assistive Systems: Evidence from Nigeria Population

Onah, C.; Ogwuche, C. H.; Haruna, A. I.

2026-07-17 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.07.16.26358233 medRxiv
Show abstract

The increasing deployment of artificial intelligence (AI) assistive systems across healthcare, education, and organisational domains necessitates a deeper understanding of dispositional factors shaping trust and acceptance. This study investigated the Big Five personality traits as predictors of trust in and acceptance of AI assistive systems among a large adult sample (N = 380) in Makurdi Benue State. Anchored in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) developed by Davis (1989), the study examined both direct and indirect pathways linking personality traits to AI acceptance through trust. Participants completed standardised measures of the Big Five Inventory, Trust in AI Scale, and AI Acceptance Scale. Data were analysed using structural equation modelling (SEM) with maximum likelihood estimation. The hypothesised model demonstrated good fit indices (CFI = .84, TLI = .82, RMSEA = .05). Openness to experience ({beta} = .34, p < .001) and agreeableness ({beta} = .27, p < .01) significantly predicted trust in AI systems, which in turn strongly predicted AI acceptance ({beta} = .62, p < .001). Neuroticism negatively predicted trust ({beta} = -.29, p < .001), while conscientiousness showed a modest positive direct effect on acceptance ({beta} = .18, p < .05). Extraversion was not a significant direct predictor but exerted an indirect effect through trust. Mediation analysis confirmed that trust significantly mediated the relationship between personality traits and AI acceptance. The findings underscore the centrality of dispositional traits in shaping technological trust formation and highlight the psychological architecture underlying human AI interaction. These results contribute to social psychological theory and provide empirical guidance for designing personality sensitive AI systems to enhance user adoption and sustained engagement.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 4%
32.0%
2
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.7%
3
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
4
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
JMIRx Med
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
9
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
12
Public Health
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
15
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
17
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
18
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
19
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
20
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
21
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
23
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
24
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Journal of Neurogenetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%