Back

Validating Artificial Intelligence Guidance for Ultrasound Acquisition and Remote Interpretation

Maldonado, T.; Muluk, S.; Rali, P.; Soni, N.; Nathanson, R.; Kuttab, H.; VandeHei, M.; Michels, C.; Swietlik, J.; Speranza, G.; Schaffer, O.; Collaborating Investigators Group, ; Al Noor, F.; Mischkewitz, S.; Kainz, B.; Blaivas, M.; Jacobowitz, G.

2026-07-19 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.07.16.26356882 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), remains a major global health burden. Diagnostic pathways rely on ultrasound but are limited by availability and prolonged time-to-imaging. Novel artificial intelligence (AI) guidance systems have been designed to enable non-ultrasound-trained operators to acquire proximal lower extremity compression ultrasounds for remote clinician interpretation. Methods: This multicenter, double-blinded, prospective, nonrandomized study evaluated the performance of an AI guidance system (ThinkSono Guidance, ThinkSono, GmbH). Patients underwent AI-guided ultrasound(s) and standard of care ultrasound(s). Primary and secondary endpoints were image quality, sensitivity and specificity for proximal DVT, and prioritization specificity, a measure of specificity in identifying patients requiring standard of care ultrasound after AI-guided scan. Results: Of 634 recruited subjects, 594 were analyzed, with 67 DVTs across 700 scans. 86.83% of AI-guided scans achieved diagnostic image quality. Triage sensitivity was 92.86%, triage specificity 39.12%, prioritization specificity 97.96%. Standard of care ultrasounds could be avoided in 35.32% of patients. Total median AI-guided scan and review time was 7.57 minutes. Conclusions: Clinician-reviewed AI-guided scans were rapid, sensitive for DVT, and specific for prioritizing patients requiring standard of care ultrasounds. These findings suggest AI-guided ultrasound may be a scalable triage strategy to expand DVT evaluation access, particularly in resource-constrained and after-hours settings

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
12.8%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.4%
4
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
5
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.5%
7
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
10
Rheumatology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
12
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
13
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.8%
15
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Clinical Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
17
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
21
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
22
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
23
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
24
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
25
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
26
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
27
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
28
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
29
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
30
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%