Back

PARIS (Pneumonia: Acute Respiratory Infection +/- Sepsis): a prospective single-centre observational cohort study of hospitalised patients with pneumonia

Nasser, S. T.; Piercy, C. R.; Falinska, A.; O'Sullivan, D. M.; Devonshire, A.; Martinez-Estrada, F.; Huggett, J.; Creagh-Brown, B. C.

2026-07-17 respiratory medicine
10.64898/2026.07.15.26357955 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction Hospitalised community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is heterogeneous in aetiology, severity, and outcome. Phenotyping and endotyping approaches offer potential to stratify patients biologically and guide targeted therapy, but require well-characterised cohorts with linked biosamples. We describe the PARIS (Pneumonia: Acute Respiratory Infection +/- Sepsis) study: a prospective observational cohort of hospitalised patients with pneumonia, designed to characterise functional outcomes and to provide a biobank for translational immunological research. Methods Adults admitted with CAP to a single NHS district general hospital were enrolled within 24 hours of admission between December 2020 and March 2022. Clinical, functional, and physiological data were collected at enrolment, hospital discharge, and 6-8 week follow-up. Serial blood samples were collected for flow cytometry, transcriptomics, pathogen DNA detection, and plasma biobanking. Results Forty-seven patients were enrolled (15 without and 32 with sepsis [SOFA >=2] at enrolment); 87% met sepsis criteria by 24 hours post enrolment. Most patients (30/47, 64%) were managed as COVID-19, microbiologically confirmed in 27. Mean age was 57 years (SD 16), 70% were male, and baseline comorbidity burden was low. Severity was moderate (median NEWS2 4 at enrolment, rising to 6 by 24 hours post enrolment; p<0.001). Mortality was 4/47 (8.5%), with 44/47 (94%) alive at hospital discharge. Median length of stay was 8 days (IQR 5.5-11). Translational samples were collected from the majority: fresh flow cytometry (44/47, 94%), transcriptomics from the sepsis subgroup (31/32, 97%), pathogen DNA sampling (35 samples received across study timepoints; see Table 5), and stored plasma (29/47, 62%). The primary outcome of functional decline (Barthel score decrease >=1.85) occurred in only 1/29 patients with paired assessments (3.4%). Persistent CRP elevation (>3 mg/L) at 6-8 week follow-up was present in 16/31 (52%) survivors with available data. Conclusions The PARIS cohort provides a well-characterised clinical platform and linked biobank to support translational studies of pneumonia and sepsis. The low rate of functional decline reflects the younger, lower-comorbidity, COVID-predominant population recruited. Primary protocol endpoints were not achieved owing to pandemic-related disruption. Data and samples underpin a programme of linked translational studies.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.6%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.1%
3
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.4%
4
Thorax
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
5
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
6
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
7
Critical Care Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
EMBO Molecular Medicine
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
The Lancet Microbe
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.0%
12
Leukemia
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
13
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.6%
14
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
16
ERJ Open Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
17
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
18
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
20
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
21
CHEST
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
22
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
23
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
24
Clinical Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
25
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
26
Life
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
27
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
28
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
29
Critical Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
30
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 41%
0.6%