Back

Photobiomodulation promotes wound healing and functional improvement following lumbar decompression surgery: a double-blinded, placebo-controlled study

Rivera, J.; Zhou, Y.; Sak, L.; Pudewa, F.; Lee, J.; Yamamoto, M. T.; Yoo, H.; Lum, M.; Zhang, M.; Patel, A.; Vandenberghe, L. E.; Fenn, S. K.; Wang, Y.; Bailey, B.; Holley, S. M.; Vivas, A. C.; Holly, L. T.; Lu, D. C.

2026-07-17 surgery
10.64898/2026.07.15.26357882 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: Photobiomodulation therapy has emerged as a promising modality to facilitate scar healing and pain management in dermatology and plastic surgery. However, its role in postoperative care following spine surgeries remains understudied. This double-blinded, placebo-controlled study aimed to investigate the effects of photobiomodulation in patients with chronic lower back pain undergoing lumbar decompression, with postoperative wound healing as the primary outcome and pain reduction and functional recovery as secondary outcomes. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive either active photobiomodulation braces (N=13) or placebo braces (N=12). Follow-up assessments were performed at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Outcomes included wound healing (Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale), back and leg pain (Visual Analog Scale), quality of life (EuroQol 5D), and functional status (Oswestry Disability Index). Results: Compared to the placebo group, the photobiomodulation treatment group had a 4.12-fold cumulative improvement in final scar scores, with significant between-group differences at postoperative weeks 6, 8, and 12 (p = 0.0062, 0.010, 0.042). Among patients with severe preoperative disability, treatment resulted in a 1.89-fold faster improvement in back pain (p=0.025) and a 1.80-fold faster improvement in ODI scores (p=0.025); and superior treatment effect on wound healing were again observed at weeks 6, 8, and 12. Among patients with poor initial scars, treatment led to a significantly better scar outcome than placebo at week 6 and a 1.94-fold faster EQ5D improvement (p=0.052), with significant gains observed as early as two weeks after surgery. There were no adverse events associated with photobiomodulation treatment. Conclusions: Photobiomodulation significantly promoted postoperative wound healing following lumbar decompression surgery, with therapeutic benefits preserved even in patients with poor baseline scar scores and functional impairment. This indicates that the efficacy of photobiomodulation is not limited by the initial scar condition or disability, supporting its broad clinical applicability. Additionally, patients with severe preoperative disability experienced greater benefits from photobiomodulation than placebo, including faster reduction in back pain and more rapid improvement in functional capacity, highlighting its role in postoperative pain management and rehabilitation. These therapeutic effects are likely mediated by photobiomodulation-induced reduction of inflammation and enhancement of tissue repair. Together, this study suggests that photobiomodulation can be a promising adjunct therapy to facilitate postoperative recovery in patients undergoing spine surgery.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pain
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.3%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
16.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
5
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
6
Systematic Reviews
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
7
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.6%
10
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
11
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
12
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
14
British Journal of Anaesthesia
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Value in Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
18
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
European Journal of Pain
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%