Back

Storing >1 byte of information in 16S ribosomal RNA using orthogonal trans-splicing ribozymes

Dysart, M. J.; Fang, L.; Karinje, L. K.; Chappell, J.; Stadler, L. B.; Silberg, J. J.

2026-07-15 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.07.14.738544 bioRxiv
Show abstract

TEXT ABSTRACTCatalytic-RNA (cat-RNA) expressed from mobile DNA can record cellular events, such as the uptake of plasmids via horizontal gene transfer, by splicing a barcode onto 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) - a system termed RNA addressable modification (RAM). However, scaling RAM to record multiple simultaneous biological events requires large numbers of orthogonal cat-RNA whose signals reflect the biological features under investigation rather than variability arising from the barcode sequence. Here, we explore how to design orthogonal cat-RNA to record information about multiple plasmid-encoded traits in parallel. We show that cat-RNA having tRNA-derived barcodes with sequence variation in the anticodon stem-loop present greater signal consistency within Escherichia coli than mRNA-derived barcodes. When orthogonal cat-RNA designs harboring tRNA-derived barcodes were evaluated in Vibrio natriegens and Pseudomonas putida, increased variance was observed compared with Escherichia coli. Nevertheless, the signal consistency was sufficient to use these orthogonal cat-RNAs to report on the relative activities of four promoters and two origins of replication by sequencing barcoded-rRNA derived from the three organisms. These results show how RAM can be multiplexed to report on mobile DNA features in microbial communities and illustrate the importance of accounting for variability in RNA outputs when designing and interpreting multiplexed RNA barcoding data. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=88 SRC="FIGDIR/small/738544v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (29K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@406ebaorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@259751org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f1512corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8384b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
32.2%
2
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.7%
50% of probability mass above
3
Synthetic Biology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.9%
5
Trends in Biotechnology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
6
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
7
Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.2%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
10
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
11
MicrobiologyOpen
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
13
RNA Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
15
RNA
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Microbial Biotechnology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
18
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
22
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%
23
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
24
RSC Chemical Biology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.5%
25
Biotechnology Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
26
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
27
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
28
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
29
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
30
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.5%