Back

Muscle proteins in plasma associate to distinguished phenotypes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

Azizi, L.; Aksoylu, I.; Bueno Alvez, M.; Foucher, J.; Juto, A.; Seitz, C.; Press, R.; Samuelsson, K.; Kläppe, U.; Uhlen, M.; Edfors, F.; Bergström, S.; Fang, F.; Nilsson, P.; Öijerstedt, L.; Manberg, A.; Ingre, C.

2026-07-16 neurology
10.64898/2026.07.14.26357727 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by death of upper and lower motor neurons, usually presented with clinical heterogeneity. Fluid biomarker development remains dominated by neurofilament light chain (NEFL), a marker of neuroaxonal injury. NEFL is however unspecific to ALS and its phenotypes and there is currently a lack of biomarkers that capture ALS heterogeneity such as onset site and ALS-frontotemporal spectrum disorder (ALS-FTSD). Therefore, we investigated whether plasma proteomics could reveal pathway-level signatures that stratify and explain ALS heterogeneity. Methods: We profiled ~5,400 plasma proteins (Olink Explore HT) in 299 patients with ALS and 50 age- and sex comparable healthy controls. We used two complementary analytic frameworks: (i) differential protein abundance analysis to identify altered proteins in ALS and across clinical subgroups, and (ii) weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) to identify coordinated protein modules and relate them to ALS diagnosis and to ALS-specific clinical traits (site of onset, ALS-FTSD, ALS functional rating scale-revised (ALSFRS-R) score, and plasma NEFL). Results: Differential abundance analysis identified 56 proteins altered in ALS versus controls, of which 40 were increased. WGCNA identified 11 co-expression modules, with ALS samples having the strongest correlation to a protein module (n=51) highly enriched for muscle-related proteins. Out of the 40 proteins that had increased expression levels, 29 overlapped with the muscle-enriched protein module, indicating that muscle related proteins are the dominant circulating proteomic signature in ALS. This signal extended to clinical stratification: spinal-onset patients showed a strong positive association with the muscle-module. Further, differential abundance analysis of spinal- versus bulbar-onset ALS identified changes that mapped predominantly to the same module, supporting a molecular signature of onset phenotype. In contrast, cognitive status (ALS-FTSD) mapped to distinct modules enriched for extracellular matrix/cell-adhesion pathways, consistent with a separable biological axis of disease heterogeneity. Although multiple modules correlated with NEFL, trait-specific signatures were not fully explained by neuroaxonal injury. Notably, the muscle-enriched module increased with higher NEFL and lower ALSFRS-R, supporting its interpretation as a severity-linked, muscle-involvement proxy. Conclusions: Large-scale plasma proteomics reveals that heterogeneity in ALS reflects underlying biological structures. We identified a dominant muscle-associated protein network that distinguished ALS patients from controls and correlated with disease onset phenotype and severity, alongside distinct protein networks linked to ALS-FTSD. By integrating differential protein abundance with network-based analysis, we defined pathway-level biomarker signatures that extend beyond NEFL, enabling biologically informed patient stratification and improved therapeutic monitoring.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
89 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.9%
2
Molecular Neurodegeneration
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.9%
3
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
Acta Neuropathologica
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
5
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
6
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
7
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
9
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.8%
12
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.6%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 22%
2.4%
15
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
16
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.5%
17
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
18
Journal of Neurochemistry
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
21
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
22
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
26
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
33 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
29
npj Parkinson's Disease
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
Journal of Clinical Investigation
179 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%