Back

An Exploratory Study of Prefrontal Cortex Activation Related to Golf Putting Performance Under Psychological Pressure: A Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy Approach

Hiyama, R.; Nakata, N.; Inoue, R.; Manai, T.; Hirata, T.; Sato, H.

2026-07-20 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.07.13.737385 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Neurofeedback (NF) is a promising method for helping individuals overcome choking under pressure. Identifying relevant neural biomarkers is crucial for developing effective NF. In this exploratory study, we aimed to investigate changes in prefrontal hemodynamic signals associated with golf-putting performance under psychological pressure using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Participants engaged in a one-on-one golf-putting task against an experimenter, with monetary rewards introduced to induce psychological pressure. This manipulation successfully elicited psychological pressure, leading to impaired performance in some participants. Based on performance changes between the practice and competition sessions, participants were categorized into a non-choking group (performance improved) and a choking group (performance declined). Statistical analysis revealed significantly greater increases in prefrontal activation from practice to competition in the non-choking group than in the choking group, especially in the left superior frontal gyrus. Furthermore, moderate but statistically nonsignificant negative correlations were observed between changes in activation in this region and changes in putting error, indicating that greater activation increases tended to accompany less performance deterioration or greater performance improvement. These exploratory findings suggest that the left superior frontal gyrus warrants further investigation as a candidate biomarker for NF interventions aimed at mitigating choking under pressure.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.