Vaccination status and associated factors among healthcare workers providing primary care: a cross-sectional study in Yaounde, Cameroon
Nouko, A.; Cheuyem, F. Z. L.; Nguefack, F.; Achangwa, C.; Takougang, I.
Show abstract
Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at increased risk of exposure to vaccine-preventable diseases, including hepatitis B, tuberculosis (TB), and tetanus, due to their occupational environment. Despite the availability of safe and effective vaccines, vaccination coverage among HCWs remains suboptimal in many low- and middle-income countries. This study aimed to determine the vaccination coverage for hepatitis B, tuberculosis, and tetanus among HCWs in district hospitals in Yaounde, Cameroon, and to identify factors associated with incomplete vaccination. Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted from January to June 2024 across all seven district hospitals in Yaounde. A total of 406 HCWs were enrolled using a structured, self-administered questionnaire. Incomplete vaccination status was defined as nit having received three doses for hepatitis B, at least two doses for TB, and at least three doses for tetanus. Data were analyzed using R Statistics version 4.3.3. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of incomplete vaccination, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results: Most of participants were female (75.6%) and aged 30-44 years (65.5%). Full vaccination coverage was 36.2% for hepatitis B, 15.8% for tuberculosis, and 53.4% for tetanus. Unvaccinated proportions were 43.1% for hepatitis B, 0.5% for tuberculosis, and 17.2% for tetanus. Multivariate analysis revealed that HCWs aged 55-66 years were significantly less likely to be incompletely vaccinated against hepatitis B compared to those aged 19-29 years (aOR = 0.07; 95% CI: 0.01-0.39; p = 0.004). Nurses and laboratory technicians were more likely to be incompletely vaccinated than doctors (aOR = 7.06; 95% CI: 3.82-13.6; p < 0.001 and aOR = 3.78; 95% CI: 1.73-8.52; p = 0.001, respectively). Longer professional experience was protective against incomplete vaccination for all three vaccines (p < 0.05). The main barriers to vaccination included high cost, doubts about the need for vaccination, and concerns about side effects. Conclusions: Vaccination coverage for hepatitis B, tuberculosis, and tetanus among HCWs in Yaounde remains suboptimal, particularly for hepatitis B. Addressing financial barriers, improving access to vaccines, and implementing targeted educational interventions are essential to enhance vaccine uptake and protect both HCWs and their patients from preventable occupational infections.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Health care workers’ self-perceived infection risk and COVID-19 vaccine uptake: a mixed methods study 98%
- Seroprevalence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies before and after implementation of anti-COVID-19 vaccination among hospital staff in Bangui, Central African Republic 97%
- The burden of vaccine hesitancy for routine immunization in Yaounde-Cameroon: restrictive sampling technique 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccine in Pakistan Among Health Care Workers 97%
- Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Pakistan: The paradigm of Confidence, Convenience, and Complacency; A Cross-sectional study 97%
- Age-appropriate Vaccination and Associated Factors among Children Aged 12- 35 Months in Ethiopia: A Multi-Level Analysis 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Determinants of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Engagement in Algeria: A Population-based Study with Systematic Review of Studies from Arab Countries of the MENA Region 96%
- SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: healthcare workers’ perceptions and beliefs of vaccine effectiveness and advocacy: a national survey during the first week of the World Health Organization variant alert 96%
- Health Belief, Planned Behavior, or Psychological Antecedents: What predicts COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy better among the Bangladeshi Adults? 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.