Back

Biological processes linking soft drink consumption with site-specific cancer risk within the Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global)

Fontvieille, E.; Ahmadi, N.; Mahamat-saleh, Y.; Hashem, N.; Lauby-Secretan, B.; Gunter, M. J.; Tabung, F. K.; Turner, S. D.; Kok, D. E.; Jones, L.; Herceg, Z.; Simpson, R. J.; Chan, D.; Tsilidis, K. K.; Jayedi, A.; Clary, C.; Croker, H.; Mitrou, P.; Riboli, E.; Hursting, S.; Lewis, S. J.; Dossus, L.

2026-07-16 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.07.13.26356051 medRxiv
Show abstract

This review evaluates the biological pathways linking soft drink consumption with the risk of several cancers within the framework of the Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global). Soft drink consumption has been associated with increased risk of multiple cancers, and glucose or insulin dysregulation has been proposed as a potential underlying mechanism. We applied a three-stage framework. In the first stage, we identified insulin sensitivity as the key biological process potentially linking soft drink consumption (sugar-sweetened or artificially sweetened) to cancer risk, with glucose-related and insulin-related biomarkers as potential intermediate phenotypes, using a combination of expert knowledge and a web-based text mining tool. In the second stage, we conducted targeted PubMed searches to identify studies examining associations between consumption of soft drinks and these intermediate phenotypes (IPs) and between these IPs and the risk of several cancers in adult humans. In the third stage, the evidence was evaluated by the Expert Committee on Cancer Mechanisms (MEC), who assessed the strength of the evidence for these associations. The MEC concluded that there was weak evidence supporting a role of glucose or insulin-related processes as a potential mechanistic pathway linking the consumption of sugar-sweetened or artificially sweetened beverages to the risk of various cancers evaluated.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.3%
2
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
3
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.0%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
7
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
10
Frontiers in Nutrition
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.2%
12
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
The Journal of Nutrition
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
20
Public Health Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
22
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Nature Metabolism
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Food & Function
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Leukemia
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Blood Advances
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Environment International
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
29
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%