Back

Diabetes as a Driver of Financial Toxicity Among U.S. Cancer Survivors: A Nationally Representative Analysis of NHIS 2021-2024

Tewari, J.; Tewari, V.; Qidwai, K. A.; Shah, A.; Tewari, A.; Tewari, V.; Narula, H.

2026-07-14 oncology
10.64898/2026.07.12.26357889 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Financial toxicity is an increasingly recognized survivorship issue, but whether diabetes identifies a distinct high-risk financial-toxicity phenotype among U.S. cancer survivors is not well characterized. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study using pooled 2021-2024 National Health Interview Survey Sample Adult data. Adults were classified into four mutually exclusive groups: neither cancer nor diabetes, diabetes only, cancer only, and cancer plus diabetes. The primary outcome was any financial toxicity, defined as cost-related care disruption or medication underuse in the prior 12 months. Survey-weighted prevalence estimates and multivariable Poisson regression were used to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs). Results: The weighted analytic population included 210.4 million adults with neither condition, 20.6 million with diabetes only, 20.9 million with cancer only, and 4.3 million with both cancer and diabetes. Any financial toxicity was present in 18.8%, 18.8%, 11.6%, and 17.2% of these groups, respectively. Among cancer survivors, diabetes was associated with higher prevalence of any financial toxicity (aPR 1.51, 95% CI 1.33-1.73), inability to afford prescriptions (aPR 1.71, 95% CI 1.40-2.08), skipped medication doses (aPR 1.91, 95% CI 1.48-2.46), any emergency department visit (aPR 1.35, 95% CI 1.24-1.47), and [≥]2 emergency department visits (aPR 1.55, 95% CI 1.32-1.83). In treatment-stratified analyses, the burden was greatest among insulin-treated survivors. Conclusions: Cancer survivors with diabetes represent a high-risk financial-toxicity phenotype despite frequent healthcare contact.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.0%
4
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
5.7%
5
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
7
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
9
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
10
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
12
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
13
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
16
Cancer Letters
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
American Journal of Gastroenterology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.1%
21
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
23
JAMA
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%