Back

Remote Ischemic Perconditioning and 90-Day Cognitive Outcomes After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A REMOTE-CAT Substudy

Pereira, C.; REMOTE-CAT Trial Investigators, ; Arque, G.; Regue, A.; Mauri-Capdevila, G.; Jimenez-Fabrega, X.; Subirats, T.; Ropero, J. R.; Vicente-Pascual, M.; Rovira, A.; Salvany, S.; Garcia-Vazquez, C.; Cirer-Sastre, R.; Purroy, F.

2026-07-13 neurology
10.64898/2026.07.08.26357601 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Remote ischemic perconditioning (RIperC) is a simple, noninvasive neuroprotective strategy based on brief cycles of limb ischemia-reperfusion during cerebral ischemia. REMOTE-CAT suggested a potential functional benefit of prehospital RIperC in acute ischemic stroke. However, its effect on poststroke cognitive outcomes, which may not be fully captured by global disability scales, remains uncertain. Methods: We performed an exploratory cognitive substudy of the multicenter, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled REMOTE-CAT trial. Patients with suspected acute ischemic stroke within 8 hours, prestroke modified Rankin Scale score <3, and RACE motor score >0 were randomized prehospital to RIperC or sham. RIperC consisted of five 5-minute cuff inflation-deflation cycles during ambulance transfer. At 90 days, patients from one center underwent a standardized neuropsychological battery assessing five cognitive domains. Results: Among 122 patients in the primary analysis, 58 (47.5%) completed neuropsychological assessment: 26 allocated to RIperC and 32 to sham. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in domain-specific Z scores. Cognitive impairment in at least one domain was numerically less frequent with RIperC than sham (26.9% versus 34.4%). Impairment in more than one domain was also less frequent with RIperC (7.7% versus 21.9%), although the overall distribution of impaired domains did not differ significantly between groups (P=0.244). The largest domain-specific difference was observed for visual memory impairment (3.8% versus 21.9%). Conclusions: In this exploratory substudy, prehospital RIperC did not significantly improve 90-day cognitive outcomes after acute ischemic stroke. Nevertheless, RIperC-treated patients showed numerically favorable trends, particularly in global cognitive burden and visual memory. These hypothesis-generating findings support incorporating standardized cognitive outcomes in future ischemic conditioning trials.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.