Back

Automated Net Water Uptake Quantification in Ischemic Stroke: Validation Against Manual Measurement in the AcT Trial

Singh, S.; Charatpangoon, P.; Pensato, U.; Zhang, J.; Barakhanov, K.; Kaveeta, C.; Tanaka, K.; Bala, F.; Doolan, C.; Sajobi, T. T.; Buck, B. H.; Catanese, L.; Tkach, A.; Swartz, R. H.; Singh, N.; Almekhlafi, M. A.; Menon, B. K.; Ganesh, A.

2026-07-13 neurology
10.64898/2026.07.08.26357599 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Net Water Uptake (NWU) is a non-contrast CT (NCCT) biomarker of early cerebral edema in ischemic stroke, calculated from attenuation differences between ischemic and contralateral non-ischemic brain regions. Manual NWU quantification is labor-intensive and prone to inter-operator variability, limiting clinical uptake and research scalability. We developed and internally validated a fully automated NWU evaluation pipeline. Methods: We analyzed 24-hour follow-up NCCT scans from the AcT (Alteplase compared to Tenecteplase) trial. Infarcts were automatically obtained by segmentation framework based on a synchronous image-label diffusion probability model. The images and extracted infarcts were registered to the standard MNI152 space, allowing us to mirror the infarct onto the contralateral hemisphere symmetrically, regardless of size or tilt angle. Subsequently, the mirrored region was inversely transformed to return to its original space. Voxels outside the range of 20-80 Hounsfield Units (HU) were excluded to remove non-parenchymal tissue. Automated NWU was computed as the percentage difference in mean HU between infarct and mirrored contralateral regions. The agreement with manually determined NWU was evaluated using Pearson correlation, mean absolute error (MAE), and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: Of 1,327 patients in the trial, 298 (22.5%) met predefined imaging-quality criteria for the manual validation analysis, including well-aligned raw NCCT scans in the axial plane and clear parenchymal infarct segmentations. Automated 24-hour NWU showed excellent agreement with manual measurements (r = 0.99). Mean absolute error was 0.18% (95% CI: 0.01-0.46). Bland-Altman analysis demonstrated minimal bias (0.09%) and satisfactory limits of agreement (-4.05% to +4.24%). Ninety-nine percent of cases fell within {+/-}5% of the manually determined value. Conclusions: Our automated mirrored segmentation pipeline enables accurate and reproducible NWU quantification from routine 24-hour NCCT scans, matching expert manual measurements with minimal bias.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.3%
2
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.0%
3
Stroke
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.4%
5
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.1%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.3%
7
Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
10
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
11
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
Neurocritical Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
16
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
NeuroImage: Reports
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
18
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
19
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
20
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
22
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
23
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
25
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
26
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Annals of Neurology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Neurosurgery
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%