Back

Urinary iodine concentration after household use of iodine-fortified bouillon among women of reproductive age and preschool children in northern Ghana: A secondary analysis of the CoMIT trial

Kyereh, F. K.; Ohemeng, A. N.; Engle-Stone, R.; Wessells, K. R.; Kumordzie, S. M.; Arnold, C. D.; Davis, J. N.; Becher, E. R.; Fuseini, A. D.; Nyaaba, K. W.; Tan, X.; Vosti, S. A.; Adu-Afarwuah, S.

2026-07-09 nutrition
10.64898/2026.07.07.26357449 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Monitoring urinary iodine concentration (UIC) after sustained exposure informs iodine delivery strategies. We aimed to compare endline UIC among women of reproductive age (WRA) and preschool children (PSC) receiving multiple micronutrient-fortified (MMF) vs. iodine-only bouillon, and to describe population iodine status at baseline and endline. Methods: This pre-specified secondary outcome analysis used Condiment Micronutrient Innovation Trial (CoMIT) data. Non-pregnant, non-lactating WRA (15-49 years) and PSC (2-5 years) were enrolled at the household level. Households received MMF or iodine-only bouillon for 9 months (38 weeks); both contained iodine (KIO3) at 30 ug/g. Baseline and endline UIC (ug/L) were measured by modified Sandell-Kolthoff reaction in spot urine samples. ANCOVA models, adjusted for baseline log-UIC and recruitment site, compared endline geometric mean UIC between trial arms. Median UIC at both timepoints was compared to WHO cut-offs (ug/L): <100 (insufficient), 100-199 (adequate), 200-299 (above requirements), and >=300 (excessive); the prevalence of UIC <50 ug/L was calculated. Results: Endline UIC data were available for 611 WRA and 630 PSC. Adjusted endline UIC did not differ by arm (geometric mean ratio [95% CI]: WRA 0.97 [0.86-1.10]; PSC 0.96 [0.84-1.10]). With arms combined, median UIC increased among WRA (100.5 to 124.6 ug/L) and PSC (109.6 to 136.9 ug/L), with fewer samples <50 ug/L at endline. Conclusions: Adjusted endline UIC did not differ between trial arms. After 9 months' use of iodine-fortified bouillon, median UIC remained adequate among WRA and PSC, with fewer samples <50 ug/L at endline.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.7%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.7%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.9%
4
The Journal of Nutrition
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
5
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
6
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.5%
8
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.5%
9
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
10
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Public Health Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
12
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.5%
16
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Journal of Global Health
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%