A clustering approach based on neuropsychological testing to detect early signs of probable MCI among community-dwelling older adults
Mauti, R.; Chouk, C.; Guillot, A.; Perronin, A.; Fargier, P.; Chabaud, P.
Show abstract
Introduction: Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is defined as a decline in one or more cognitive domains worse than expected for age and encompasses several subtypes depending on the cognitive(s) function(s) impaired. Older adults presenting amnestic MCI combined with one or several other impaired domains are the highest at risk of dementia. Yet, no consensual screening method for MCI in community-dwelling older adults has been established. The aim of this study was to identify cognitive aging profiles using multivariate analysis based on three neuropsychological assessments and to characterize profiles consistent with different probable MCI subtypes. Methods: A total of 161 community-dwelling older adults from the 13EVAL cluster-randomized controlled trial performed the Montreal Cognitive Assessment including the Memory Index Score, the Trail Making Test and the Victoria Stroop Test. Hierarchical clustering on principal components was conducted based on four cognitive domains (global cognition, memory, inhibition and cognitive flexibility) and age. Inter-groups comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA. Individual performances were compared to normative standard for each assessment to characterize each group. Results: Three clusters were identified that differed significantly in age (F2,158=78.56, p<.001, 2p=.50), global cognition (F2,158=96.07, p<.001, 2p=.55), memory (F2,158=81.48, p<.001, 2p=.51), cognitive flexibility (F2,158=52.25, p<.001, 2p=.40) and inhibition (F2,158=12.14, p<.001, 2p=.13). Inter-groups comparisons and comparisons to normative values led to the characterization of Cluster 1 as normal cognition, Cluster 2 as probable executive MCI and Cluster 3 as probable amnestic and executive MCI. Conclusions: Individuals with cognitive profiles consistent with probable executive MCI were identified using simple assessments of global cognition, memory and executive functions in a community-dwelling older population. As participants were not clinically diagnosed, further prospective studies are needed to determine the screening performance of this approach.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- White matter hyperintensity load varies depending on definition of subjective cognitive decline 96%
- Practice makes imperfect: stronger implicit interference with practice in individuals at high risk of developing Alzheimer's disease 95%
- Topographical differences in white matter hyperintensity burden and cognition in aging, MCI, and AD 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility and reliability of online vs in-person cognitive testing in healthy older people 96%
- The Healthy Brain 9 (HB9): A New Instrument to Characterize Subjective Cognitive Decline, and Detect Anosognosia in Mild Cognitive Impairment 95%
- Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cognitive function in Japanese community-dwelling older adults in a class for preventing cognitive decline 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subtypes of brain change in aging and their associations with cognition and Alzheimer's disease biomarkers 94%
- Cerebrovascular response to exercise interacts with individual genotype and amyloid-beta deposition to influence response inhibition with aging 94%
- Metacognition, cortical thickness, and tauopathy in aging 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Alpha peak frequency is linked to episodic memory impairment in pathological aging 96%
- Regular Tai Chi Practice Is Associated with Improved Memory as well as Structural and Functional Integrity of the Hippocampal Formation in the Elderly 95%
- Enriching hippocampal memory function in older adults through real-world exploration 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.