Which African Countries are at Risk of Missing SDG 3.2? Bayesian Mapping of Under-Five Mortality Using UNICEF 2024 Data
Oladimeji, D. M.; Mustapha, A. K.; Ekop, E. E.
Show abstract
Abstract Background: Despite considerable reductions in under-five mortality during the Millennium Development Goal era, progress towards Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 3.2 remains uneven across Africa. Identifying countries at greatest risk of missing the target is essential for prioritizing interventions and resource allocation. Methods: A Bayesian spatial forecasting ecological study was conducted using 2024 country-level data from 49 African countries obtained from UNICEF. Spatial dependence was assessed using Global Moran's I and Local Indicators of Spatial Association. Bayesian structured additive regression models with Gaussian, Gamma, and Exponential likelihoods were fitted using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation (INLA) and compared using the Deviance Information Criterion (DIC), Watanabe-Akaike Information Criterion (WAIC), and conditional predictive ordinates. Posterior exceedance probabilities were estimated, an SDG Failure Index (SFI) and a Priority Intervention Index (PII) were developed, and Bayesian posterior predictive simulations were performed to estimate country-specific probabilities of attaining SDG 3.2 by 2030. Results: Significant spatial clustering of under-five mortality was observed with (Moran's I = 0.355, p < 0.001), and hotspots in Benin, Cameroon, and Nigeria. The Gamma model provided the best fit (DIC = 114.92; WAIC = 111.71). Diarrhoea was the only significant predictor (posterior mean=0.030; 95% credible interval: 0.004-0.056). Twenty-three countries (46.9%) were classified as high risk, whereas only five (10.2%) had achieved SDG 3.2. West Africa recorded the highest mean mortality (7.05%) and North Africa the lowest (1.64%). Bayesian projections indicated that only five countries were likely to achieve SDG 3.2 by 2030, while 41 (83.7%) were unlikely to do so. Conclusion: Considerable geographical inequalities in under-five mortality persist across Africa, and most countries remain off-track for achieving SDG 3.2 by 2030. The integration of exceedance probability mapping, the SDG Failure Index, the Priority Intervention Index, and Bayesian probability forecasting provides a practical framework for monitoring progress and prioritizing countries requiring accelerated action towards achieving SDG 3.2.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Does the Data Tell the True Story? A Modelling Study of Early COVID-19 Pandemic Suppression and Mitigation Strategies in Ghana 95%
- A cost analysis comparing Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention with and without Vitamin A Supplementation among under-5 children in Nigeria 94%
- Climatic suitability predictions for the cultivation of macadamia in Malawi using climate change scenarios. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying Priority Countries for Scaling Up Small-Quantity Lipid-Based Nutrient Supplements 95%
- An in-depth statistical analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic’s initial spread in the WHO African region 94%
- Country-Specific Estimates of Misclassification Rates of Computer-Coded Verbal Autopsy Algorithms 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Shifting transmission risk for malaria in Africa with climate change: a framework for planning and intervention 95%
- Fine scale spatial mapping of urban malaria prevalence for microstratification in an urban area of Ghana 94%
- Addressing child health inequity through case management of under-five malaria in Nigeria: A model-based extended cost-effectiveness analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Generalized Structured Additive Regression Models to determine factors associated with and clusters for COVID-19 hospital deaths in South Africa 95%
- Understanding Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices on Ebola Virus Disease: A Multi-Site Mixed Methods Survey on Preparedness in Rwanda 93%
- Mpox knowledge and perception in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.