Back

Enhancement of a STING Agonist Vaccine for Tuberculosis Using Locally Supercharged MS2 Viral Capsids

Martin, H. S.; amb-Echegaray, I. D.; Huang, P.; Shallow, L.; Balakhmet, A.; Pratakshya, P.; Stanley, S.; Francis, M. B.

2026-07-09 immunology
10.64898/2026.07.03.736450 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) infection kills more people worldwide than any other pathogen. While the Bacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine for Mtb has been widely used for over a century, it provides insufficient protection to eradicate this disease. One of our labs has recently established that a protein antigen (H1) can be combined with a STING pathway agonist to achieve strong protection against Mtb in mice, with performance that exceeds that of the BCG vaccine. However, its reliance on a synthetic cyclic dinucleotide (CDN) with relatively poor cell uptake requires higher dosing levels, thus increasing costs. To increase the efficiency of this vaccine and provide a delivery strategy that could also be used in humans, the H1 Mtb antigen and CDN adjuvant were conjugated to genome-free MS2 viral capsids that included cationic mutations to increase cell uptake. Specifically, the H1 antigen was conjugated to the external surface of MS2 using a tyrosinase-mediated oxidative coupling reaction, and the native STING agonist cGAMP was coupled to internal cysteine residues through a reductively cleavable disulfide linker. The resulting MS2-H1 and MS2-cGAMP conjugates were then co-delivered for three doses of vaccination in mice before exposure to Mtb. The MS2-based vaccine platform was observed to have comparable efficacy to the original H1/CDN formulation, but its enhanced uptake properties enabled 57-fold less CDN and 3-fold less H1 antigen. Additionally, this vaccine elicited immune responses that have been previously demonstrated to correlate with protection. The ability of the capsid shells to protect the CDN cargo during transport allowed enzymatically produced, and thus readily accessible, cGAMP to be used instead of more costly CDNs that require many synthetic steps. This, combined with the reduced overall amount of CDN and H1 that was required, could lower the production costs of future vaccines substantially. Finally, the ability of the capsid-based carriers to bypass the membrane transporters for CDNs suggests that this enhanced vaccination platform is likely to exhibit improved human efficacy in future studies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Controlled Release
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.8%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.2%
3
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
4
ACS Infectious Diseases
82 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
5
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
6
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
8
Advanced Therapeutics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
ChemBioChem
55 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
10
npj Vaccines
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
11
Advanced Materials
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
13
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
15
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.1%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.1%
19
Vaccine
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Nanoscale Advances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
22
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
23
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Lab Animal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
26
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
27
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.6%
28
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
29
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%