Back

Efficacy and Safety of Whartons Jelly-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Randomized Pilot Trial

Atehortua, L.; Estrada-Mira, S.; Torres-Alzate, S.; Velazquez, O.; Florez, J. P.; Villegas, F.; Atehortua, M.; Villada, O.; Ortiz, J. C.; Jaimes, F.

2026-07-07 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.64898/2026.07.03.26357234 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction Whartons jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells (WJ-MSCs) have emerged as a promising regenerative strategy for ischemic heart disease because of their immunomodulatory, angiogenic, and antifibrotic properties. This pilot randomized trial evaluated the safety, feasibility, and exploratory efficacy of intramyocardial WJ-MSC administration combined with an extracellular matrix (ECM) patch in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods In this randomized, controlled pilot trial, 28 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%, and viable myocardium on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were assigned to receive intramyocardial WJ-MSC injections plus an extracellular matrix (ECM) patch or a placebo patch. Patients were followed for 12 months with echocardiography, cardiac MRI, Holter monitoring, functional assessment, and quality-of-life evaluation. Results Among 44 screened patients, 28 were randomized (16 to WJ-MSC and 12 to control). At 12 months, echocardiography showed a greater improvement in LVEF in the WJ-MSC group than in the control group (8% vs. 0%, p=0.045). Myocardial fibrosis decreased by 32% in both groups. Cardiac MRI demonstrated improvement in both groups, with numerically greater gains in LVEF and larger reductions in fibrosis in the WJ-MSC arm, although between-group differences were not statistically significant. No significant between-group differences were observed in ventricular arrhythmias or serious adverse events. Two non-cardiac postoperative deaths occurred in the WJ-MSC group. Conclusions Intramyocardial WJ-MSC administration combined with an ECM patch during CABG appears feasible and safe, with signals of functional improvement. Larger, adequately powered trials are needed to confirm efficacy and long-term safety.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.7%
2
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.7%
3
International Journal of Cardiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
4
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 30%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
7
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
8
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.5%
9
Trials
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
10
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
11
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
12
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
14
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Applied Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
24
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
25
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Cardiovascular Research
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
28
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.5%
30
Circulation Research
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%