Back

Evaluating Student Use, Access, and Perceptions of a Campus Sexual Health Vending Machine

Sheng, G.; Gualtieri, L.

2026-07-06 public and global health
10.64898/2026.07.03.26357232 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Sexual health vending machines have emerged as a promising approach to expanding access to contraception and other sexual health products on college campuses. This study evaluated patterns of use, perceived accessibility, and student attitudes towards the sexual health vending machine at Tufts University. Methods: This mixed-methods evaluation combined an online survey with vending machine refill data. Analyses included descriptive analysis, chi-square tests, and thematic analysis of open-ended responses. Results: The survey was open from October to December 2025 and included 118 respondents. Self-reported use suggests students engage with the vending machine on an as-needed basis. Users were significantly more likely to agree that it increased their likelihood of using a condom, compared with non-users. However, both groups expressed strong support for the vending machine, reporting that it improved access to sexual health resources, offered satisfactory product variety, and should be provided by the university. Although many students appreciated its visibility and role in reducing stigma, concerns about privacy and discretion were the most commonly reported reasons for non-use. Restock data indicated sustained year-round utilization, with expected decreases during vacation periods. Conclusion: Overall, these findings suggest that sexual health vending machines represent a scalable strategy for expanding access to sexual health resources in university settings. Offering a unique combination of immediacy, affordability, and convenience, this low-barrier resource may also promote preventive sexual health behaviors across campus, even among non-users, and support broader efforts to prevent sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancy among young adults.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 6%
23.4%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.4%
3
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.3%
4
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.2%
5
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
7
Sexually Transmitted Infections
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
8
Preventive Medicine Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Annals of Internal Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
11
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
12
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Open Research Europe
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
18
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
19
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Public Health in Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
21
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.9%
24
Public Health
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
26
Archives of Public Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
27
International Journal of Drug Policy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
28
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%
29
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.5%
30
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%