Back

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Accuracy in Anticipating Supplemental Opioid Use Following Third Molar Extraction

van den Dries, S. R.; Panchal, N.; Wang, S.; Habib, R. A.; Ford, B. P.; Secreto, S. A.; Hersh, E. V.; Theken, K.

2026-07-06 dentistry and oral medicine
10.64898/2026.07.02.26357136 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Accurately identifying patients who will require opioids after third molar extraction could improve pain management while supporting opioid stewardship. This study evaluated surgeon accuracy in predicting supplemental opioid use following treatment with ibuprofen and acetaminophen. Methods: Patients (N=85) undergoing third molar extraction were treated with a standardized analgesic regimen of ibuprofen+acetaminophen, with supplemental opioid if needed. Four surgeons independently reviewed preoperative radiographs, assessed surgical difficulty using the Pederson scale, and rated the likelihood of supplemental opioid use on a 5-point Likert scale. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The relationship between surgeon ratings and postoperative opioid use was evaluated using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Seventeen patients used supplemental opioid analgesics. Inter-rater reliability among surgeons was moderate (ICC3=0.606, 95%CI: 0.505-0.700), while reliability of the average rating across surgeons was good (ICC3k = 0.860, 95% CI: 0.804-0.903). Median surgeon rating was not associated with postoperative opioid use (OR: 0.800, 95% CI: 0.414-1.51, p=0.496) and demonstrated poor discrimination (AUC: 0.551, 95% CI: 0.392-0.710). Surgeon ratings were positively associated with Pederson score (beta=0.073, 95%CI: 0.050-0.096; p<0.001). Conclusions: Surgeons demonstrated moderate agreement, but these assessments did not accurately identify patients who ultimately required supplemental opioids. Surgeon judgments appeared to be influenced by anticipated surgical difficulty. Practical Implications: Clinicians should follow current recommendations against routine "just-in-case" opioid prescribing after third molar extraction. Future studies should focus on identifying clinical and biological predictors of inadequate analgesic response to NSAIDs to support individualized pain management strategies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
20.2%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 2%
8.6%
3
Journal of Dental Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.0%
5
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.4%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.7%
9
Children
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
10
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
11
BioMed Research International
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
12
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
13
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
14
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
15
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
16
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
17
Pain
78 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
18
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
European Journal of Pain
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
Journal of Medical Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%