Back

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeon Accuracy in Anticipating Supplemental Opioid Use Following Third Molar Extraction

van den Dries, S. R.; Panchal, N.; Wang, S.; Habib, R. A.; Ford, B. P.; Secreto, S. A.; Hersh, E. V.; Theken, K.

2026-07-06 dentistry and oral medicine
10.64898/2026.07.02.26357136 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Accurately identifying patients who will require opioids after third molar extraction could improve pain management while supporting opioid stewardship. This study evaluated surgeon accuracy in predicting supplemental opioid use following treatment with ibuprofen and acetaminophen. Methods: Patients (N=85) undergoing third molar extraction were treated with a standardized analgesic regimen of ibuprofen+acetaminophen, with supplemental opioid if needed. Four surgeons independently reviewed preoperative radiographs, assessed surgical difficulty using the Pederson scale, and rated the likelihood of supplemental opioid use on a 5-point Likert scale. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). The relationship between surgeon ratings and postoperative opioid use was evaluated using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Seventeen patients used supplemental opioid analgesics. Inter-rater reliability among surgeons was moderate (ICC3=0.606, 95%CI: 0.505-0.700), while reliability of the average rating across surgeons was good (ICC3k = 0.860, 95% CI: 0.804-0.903). Median surgeon rating was not associated with postoperative opioid use (OR: 0.800, 95% CI: 0.414-1.51, p=0.496) and demonstrated poor discrimination (AUC: 0.551, 95% CI: 0.392-0.710). Surgeon ratings were positively associated with Pederson score (beta=0.073, 95%CI: 0.050-0.096; p<0.001). Conclusions: Surgeons demonstrated moderate agreement, but these assessments did not accurately identify patients who ultimately required supplemental opioids. Surgeon judgments appeared to be influenced by anticipated surgical difficulty. Practical Implications: Clinicians should follow current recommendations against routine "just-in-case" opioid prescribing after third molar extraction. Future studies should focus on identifying clinical and biological predictors of inadequate analgesic response to NSAIDs to support individualized pain management strategies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.