Back

A Pilot Study on Serum Lipidomic Alterations in Patients with Adrenal Tumors

Chocholouskova, M.; Ctvrtlik, F.; Tudos, Z.; Hartmann, I.; Schovanek, J.; Vostalova, J.; Proskova, J.; Pacak, K.; Holcapek, M.

2026-07-10 oncology
10.64898/2026.07.01.26356676 medRxiv
Show abstract

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy posing significant diagnostic challenges, particularly in distinguishing it from other adrenal tumors, such as adenoma and pheochromocytoma, due to overlapping imaging and biochemical features. Improved non-invasive tools are critically needed for earlier, more accurate classification of this rare cancer. This pilot study analyzed serum lipidomic profiles in ACC, pheochromocytoma, and adenoma patients versus healthy volunteers. The most significant alterations occurred in sphingomyelins (SM) and diacylglycerols (DG). All tumor samples showed reduced very-long odd-chain SM (e.g., SM 39:1, SM 41:1, SM 41:2) and elevated DG (e.g., DG 34:1, DG 34:2, DG 36:2). These abnormalities were most pronounced in malignant tumors: ACC and metastases (AUC = 0.933), followed by pheochromocytoma (AUC = 0.800) and adenoma (AUC = 0.711). ACC patients also exhibited specific lipid signatures with decreased alkyl/alkenyl phospholipids (e.g., PE O-38:5) and lysophosphatidylcholines (e.g., LPC 20:5, LPC 18:2) versus healthy volunteers, not observed in pheochromocytoma or adenomas. Ceramide species (e.g., Cer 42:2;O2, Cer 34:1;O2) were increased in ACC compared to the other tumor types. Incorporating lipid-to-lipid ratios (Cer/SM, Cer/DG) further improved statistical model accuracy. Compared to clinical biochemistry/oxidative stress (OS) parameters, lipidomic profiling showed superior discriminatory power in adrenal tumor diagnosis. The presented study shows the serum lipidomic profiling as a promising non-invasive method for distinguishing adrenal tumor subtypes (ACC, pheochromocytoma, and adenoma) from healthy individuals, with strong diagnostic potential for ACC.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.2%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.0%
4
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.3%
6
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
8
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.5%
11
Journal of Lipid Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.0%
13
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Endocrinology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Oncotarget
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
16
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
21
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
The Journal of Nutrition
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Biochemical Pharmacology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Biomolecules
100 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
FEBS Open Bio
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
29
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%