Back

Indocyanine Green Fluorescence-Guided Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Breast Cancer Using the MARS Near-Infrared Imaging System: A Prospective Single-Center Feasibility Study

Kurdi, F.; Kurdi, Y.; Kurdi, M.; Pisareva, T. N.; Sukortseva, N. S.; Shiryaev, A. A.; Istranov, A. L.; Reshetov, I. V.

2026-07-01 oncology
10.64898/2026.06.30.26356987 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is an essential component of axillary staging in breast cancer. Fluorescence-guided mapping with indocyanine green (ICG) enables real-time visualization of lymphatic drainage; however, the parameters of fluorescence-signal recording require standardization. Objective. To assess the technical feasibility and clinical applicability of SLNB with ICG under near-infrared (NIR) imaging guidance in patients with breast cancer. Materials and Methods. This prospective single-center study included 30 patients who underwent ICG-guided SLNB between 2023 and 2025. In 24 patients, ICG mapping was combined with technetium-99m radioisotope navigation; in 6 patients, ICG guidance alone was used. The protocol comprised periareolar ICG injection, standardized imaging conditions, and fluorescence-index recording. Results. The protocol was completed in all 30 patients. Fluorescent visualization of the lymphatic pathway and/or the sentinel lymph node (SLN) was achieved in every case, and no ICG-related adverse reactions were recorded. The mean fluorescence index was 213.0 +/- 24.7, the median was 206.0 [192.5-237.2], and the min-max was 180-255. Conclusion. SLNB with ICG under NIR imaging guidance demonstrated technical feasibility in a prospective single-center cohort. Quantitative fluorescence-index recording may serve as a component of standardizing intraoperative fluorescence guidance. Keywords: breast cancer; sentinel lymph node biopsy; indocyanine green; near-infrared imaging; fluorescence lymphography; fluorescence index; axillary staging.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
17.6%
2
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.1%
4
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
5
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.2%
6
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
8
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.5%
9
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
10
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
12
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
Oncotarget
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
16
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
18
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
19
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
20
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
21
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
23
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
24
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
26
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Breast Cancer Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%