Back

PrEP-associated screening reduces N. gonorrhoeae transmission but increases case notifications among MSM: a modeling study

Marrec, L.; Lehtinen, S.

2026-07-02 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.06.30.26356925 medRxiv
Show abstract

The rapid scale-up of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among men who have sex with men has coincided with rising rates of bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs), particularly Neisseria gonorrhoeae. This temporal association has raised concerns that PrEP may be driving a new STI epidemic. However, the epidemiological impact of PrEP reflects a trade-off between potential behavioral risk compensation, which increases transmission risk, and intensified clinical surveillance, which shortens infection duration. Determining whether PrEP amplifies or mitigates STI transmission therefore requires understanding how these competing effects balance at the population level. To address this question, we develop a transmission model stratified by sexual activity and PrEP use, derive simple analytical conditions governing changes in prevalence, incidence, and notification rates, and evaluate these dynamics using empirically informed parameter estimates. Our analysis demonstrates that current quarterly screening guidelines are generally sufficient to reduce both the true endemic prevalence and incidence of N. gonorrhoeae, successfully overcompensating for plausible reductions in condom use. We also confirm and expand on previous findings that clinical notification rates may surge even as the true disease burden declines, driven by the detection of previously undiagnosed asymptomatic infections. These findings suggest a shift in focus from the potential impact of PrEP on STI transmission to the consequences of increased STI diagnoses and treatment, particularly whether greater antibiotic consumption may accelerate the spread of antimicrobial resistance in N. gonorrhoeae.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 5%
14.6%
2
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
3
Epidemiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.1%
5
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.0%
6
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.0%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 12%
4.2%
8
AIDS
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.2%
10
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.9%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
13
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
15
Sexually Transmitted Infections
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
16
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
17
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.6%
19
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
20
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Journal of the International AIDS Society
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
24
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%
27
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
28
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%