Back

Association between saturated fat intake and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol across the genetic spectrum: Results from the Women's Health Initiative

Barad, A.; Ritter, V.; Nudy, M.; Van Horn, L.; Allison, M. A.; Spracklen, C. N.; Liu, L.; Jung, S. Y.; Manson, J. E.; Assimes, T. L.; Stefanick, M. L.; Clarke, S. L.

2026-07-01 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.29.26356854 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Guidelines recommend reducing saturated fat intake to lower LDL-C. However, LDL-C responses to saturated fat vary substantially from person to person. Genetic factors may contribute to individual differences in response to saturated fat. Objectives: We aimed to examine whether genetic propensity for higher LDL-C modifies the association of saturated fat intake with LDL-C and incident ASCVD. Methods: We studied 20,940 genotyped postmenopausal women from the Women's Health Initiative. Exposures included saturated fat intake (percentage of total calories) derived from food frequency questionnaires and a genome-wide polygenic score for LDL-C (PGS-LDL). The primary outcome was LDL-C. The secondary outcome was incident ASCVD. Associations were assessed using multivariable linear and Cox regressions. Effect modification was evaluated using interaction terms and restricted cubic spline analyses. Results: The median LDL-C at baseline for participants with PGS-LDL below and above the median was 135 mg/dL [Q1: 114, Q3: 160] and 162 mg/dL [137, 188], respectively. Saturated fat intake was positively associated with LDL-C in the high PGS-LDL group, but the association attenuated in the low PGS-LDL group (P-interaction=0.01). Spline analysis revealed a non-linear interaction between PGS-LDL and saturated fat, with modifying effects emerging at higher PGS-LDL. Compared to individuals with low PGS-LDL and low saturated fat intake, only those with both high PGS-LDL and high saturated fat intake had increased risk for ASCVD in an adjusted analysis (HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.13-1.51). This association remained significant after further adjustment for baseline LDL-C (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01-1.37). Spline analyses of ASCVD risk revealed a similar interaction pattern to that observed for LDL-C. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the association between saturated fat intake and LDL-C and subsequent ASCVD risk may be stronger for individuals with a genetic propensity towards high LDL-C.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.6%
2
Atherosclerosis
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
6
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
7
International Journal of Obesity
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
8
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
9
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.1%
11
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
14
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
71 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
15
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
16
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
18
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.1%
20
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
22
BMC Nephrology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
24
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Journal of Hypertension
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
22 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
28
Redox Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%