Polygenic Risk Score Stratification Guides Prioritization of Modifiable Risk Factors for Stroke Prevention
Sutoh, Y.; Hachiya, T.; Otsuka-Yamasaki, Y.; Nakao, M.; Omama, S.; Koeda, Y.; Akasaka, H.; Kotozaki, Y.; Komaki, S.; Minabe, S.; Ohmomo, H.; Nishiya, N.; Sasaki, M.; Tanno, K.; Shimizu, A.
Show abstract
Background: Integrating polygenic scores (PGS) into population-based stroke prevention strategies may help reduce the stroke burden at both individual and population levels. However, prospective evidence regarding the interaction between genetic and modifiable risk factors remains limited, particularly in East Asian populations. Methods: We evaluated the influence of modifiable risk factors across PGS levels in the prospective population-based Tohoku Medical Megabank Community-Based Cohort Study. Stroke PGS was calculated using a model developed by the GIGASTROKE project. Results: During a median follow-up of 4.84 years (121,843.2 person-years), 246 incident stroke events were identified. Compared with participants in the intermediate PGS group (third quintile), those in the highest PGS group (fifth quintile) had a 60% greater risk of incident stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.34). When participants with intermediate genetic risk and no modifiable risk factors were used as the reference group, hypertension (HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.11-4.25) and diabetes (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.04-4.27) were significantly associated with an increased stroke risk in the intermediate PGS group. In contrast, multiple modifiable risk factors were significantly associated with stroke risk in the highest PGS group, including hypertension (HR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.53-5.48), diabetes (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.02-4.20), dyslipidemia (HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.28-3.79), obesity (HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.19-3.30), and smoking (HR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.34-4.89). Participants with both the highest PGS and [≥] 4 modifiable risk factors had a substantially elevated stroke risk (HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.28-5.92). The combination of genetic and modifiable risk factors significantly influenced the cumulative incidence of stroke (P<0.001). Conclusions: Modifiable risk factors substantially influenced stroke risk even among participants with high genetic susceptibility. The relative importance of modifiable risk factors for stroke prevention may differ according to an individual's genetic risk level.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging genetic data to elucidate the relationship between Covid-19 and ischemic stroke 96%
- Chromosome 10q24.32 Variants Associate with Brain Arterial Diameters in Diverse Populations: A Genome-Wide Association Study 95%
- Age at menopause and the risk of stroke: Observational and Mendelian Randomization analysis in 204,244 postmenopausal women 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Polygenic Risk Score for Coronary Artery Disease Improves the Prediction of Early-Onset Myocardial Infarction and Mortality in Men 94%
- A polygenic risk score for coronary heart disease performs well in individuals aged 70 years and older 94%
- Interleukin-6 signaling effects on ischemic stroke and other cardiovascular outcomes: a Mendelian Randomization study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Interplay between Chronic Kidney disease, Hypertension, and Stroke: Insights from a Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Analysis 95%
- Polygenic Susceptibility to Diabetes and Poor Glycemic Control in Stroke Survivors 94%
- Circulating interleukin-6 levels and incident ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based cohort studies 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Whole-genome sequencing identifies variants in ANK1 , LRRN1 , HAS1, and other genes and regulatory regions for stroke in type 1 diabetes 95%
- A multi-omics study of circulating phospholipid markers of blood pressure 92%
- Ox-LDL induces a non-inflammatory response enriched for coronary artery disease risk in human endothelial cells 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.