Back

Nitrogen use efficiency in pigs is associated with transcriptomic signatures related to amino acid metabolism, immune activity, and nutrient partitioning

Monney, B.; Ewaoluwagbemiga, E. O.; Kasper, C.

2026-07-01 genomics
10.64898/2026.06.26.733976 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dietary protein restriction challenges the allocation of amino acids to growth and other physiological functions and therefore requires coordinated metabolic adaptation. Domestic pigs provide an informative system in which to study such responses, because nitrogen retention directly affects lean growth and can be quantified accurately under controlled feeding and housing conditions. Under reduced-protein diets, pigs differ in how effectively they retain nitrogen, and this variation has a genetic basis, making them well suited to investigate the molecular regulation of nitrogen use efficiency (NUE). Here, we characterise differential gene expression and enriched pathways in liver and skeletal muscle of more than 80 pigs with two divergent NUE phenotypes (high and low) maintained under the same protein-reduced, ad libitum dietary conditions. The two NUE phenotypes were clearly distinct at the transcriptomic level, with 177 differentially expressed genes in the liver and 133 in the muscle. In the liver, differential expression and enrichment analyses indicate reduced amino acid catabolism, lower inflammatory and detoxification activity, and a metabolic state that favours lipid processing and insulin-related regulation over the use of amino acids as energy sources. In skeletal muscle, they point to reduced lipid uptake, lower reliance on amino acid oxidation, and a greater emphasis on protein synthesis, translational regulation, mitochondrial energy metabolism, and growth-related processes. These gene-level patterns were supported and extended by pathway and gene-set enrichment analyses. Together, the results suggest that high and low-NUE pigs differ through coordinated, tissue-specific molecular adaptations. Overall, variation in NUE appears to reflect coordinated, tissue-specific differences in how nutrients are allocated between energy use, storage, and lean tissue growth.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.9%
2
The Journal of Nutrition
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.7%
4
Physiological Genomics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
5
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
6
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.4%
7
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
9
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.1%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
11
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.6%
12
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
Genetics Selection Evolution
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
14
Molecular Metabolism
112 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
15
Poultry Science
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
17
Journal of Dairy Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.1%
20
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
24
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
25
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
26
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Journal of Lipid Research
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
29
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.6%
30
Function
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%