Back

Low-grade inflammation and daily life food-related motivation in obesity

Scholing, J. M.; van den Bosch, R.; Olsthoorn, L.; Loenen, J. C. J.; Mulders-Manders, C. M.; Stienstra, R.; Aarts, E.

2026-06-29 nutrition
10.64898/2026.06.26.26356659 medRxiv
Show abstract

Obesity is associated with low-grade inflammation, which - our prior work shows - causally and reversibly increases effort aversion and related brain responses during food-related decision-making. However, how these laboratory findings translate to daily-life (food) motivation remains unclear. This study investigated low-grade inflammation in more ecologically valid measures of (food-related) motivation in obesity. We conducted a cross-sectional study (N=145 women, BMI>27 kg/m2, 18-59 yrs) and a 12-week randomized controlled trial (N=57 women, BMI>30 kg/m2, 18-59 years, C-reactive protein (CPR)>3 mg/l) testing the anti-inflammatory drug colchicine versus placebo. We measured effort-related food intake using a bogus taste test, daily-life motivation using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), and dietary intake using a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). INFLA-score (CRP, white blood cell count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelets) related to lower intake of high-effort food items on the taste test ({beta} -0.26 SD, p=0.011), lower engagement in high-effort activities (OR 0.72, p<0.001), and negatively moderated the association between anticipation and activity completion in EMA (OR 0.89, p=0.032). On the FFQ, INFLA-score related to lower intake of legumes and fruits and more intake of processed meat (all p<0.05). Colchicine decreased overall caloric intake ({beta} -341 kcal, p=0.018). A decrease in inflammation related to healthier dietary choices (Spearman {rho}=0.37, p=0.013). Colchicine did not affect effort-related food intake on the taste test or EMA. These findings indicate that that obesity-related inflammation is associated with increased effort-related food intake and motivation in daily life, and that reducing inflammation decreases (unhealthy) food intake. Such effects may partly underlie the challenges of achieving and maintaining weight loss.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Appetite
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.6%
2
International Journal of Obesity
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
4
The Journal of Nutrition
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
5
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.8%
8
Frontiers in Nutrition
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
9
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
10
BMJ Nutrition, Prevention & Health
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
13
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
14
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
15
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
Food Research International
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
17
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
20
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%
21
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
22
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
23
Twin Research and Human Genetics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
24
The Journal of Immunology
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
26
Obesity
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%