Back

Effects of aging on multiple object tracking under normal and altered viewing conditions

Michaud, C.; Baures, R.; Soler, V.; Trotter, Y.; Vattier, V.; Rosito, M.; Peyrin, C.; Cottereau, B. R.

2026-06-30 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.06.25.734471 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multiple object tracking (MOT) is a core function of dynamic visual attention that relies on the ability to simultaneously monitor several moving objects. Although MOT performance is known to decline with age, and to depend on efficient oculomotor strategies, how these processes interact across the adult lifespan and under degraded visual input remains poorly understood. Here, we examined the effects of aging on MOT under normal and gaze-contingent viewing conditions simulating central and peripheral visual field loss. Sixty participants aged 20-80 years completed a MOT task while eye movements were recorded, enabling characterization of performance and oculomotor behavior across five viewing conditions. Behavioral results revealed a continuous decline in tracking performance across adulthood, indicating a graded rather than categorical effect of age. Performance was strongly reduced by visual-field restrictions, with the largest impairments under central vision occlusion. Eye-tracking analyses showed that better performance was associated with greater reliance on centroid-based gaze strategies, consistent with distributed monitoring of target configurations. Critically, older adults relied more on focal, target-based tracking under conditions simulating peripheral vision loss, and less on centroid-based strategies; this shift was associated with poorer performance. In contrast, oculomotor behavior during full-field viewing was largely preserved across age. Together, these findings suggest that aging affects multiple object tracking through combined sensory, attentional, and oculomotor mechanisms. Beyond a reduction in capacity, age-related decline also reflects systematic changes in visual sampling strategies during dynamic tracking.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.7%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.7%
4
Neurobiology of Aging
107 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
5
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
6
Communications Psychology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.7%
8
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
9
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.7%
10
Frontiers in Aging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
11
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.6%
12
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
13
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 25%
2.1%
15
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.6%
17
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.1%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.1%
21
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
22
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
Hippocampus
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
24
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
25
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%