Back

Sex differences in frailty trajectories among older adults in Mexico: a 17-year longitudinal cohort study

Brunetti, A. P.; Nicholas, J. M.; Kwabena, A.; Mansfield, K. E.; Warren-Gash, C.

2026-07-06 public and global health
10.64898/2026.06.25.26356559 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction Frailty is an ageing-related state associated with disability and mortality. Women often experience higher frailty but lower mortality than men, a pattern described as the male-female health-survival paradox. Evidence from low- and middle-income settings is limited. We examined sex differences in frailty trajectories and terminal decline in Mexico. Methods We analysed five waves (2001-2018) of the nationally representative Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS) including 12,440 adults ([&ge;]50 years at baseline). Frailty was measured using a 31-deficit frailty index (FI score; 0-1). We used survey-weighted linear mixed-effects models with time interactions, adjusted for sociodemographic, behavioural and health covariates to model sex differences in frailty trajectories. Terminal decline in FI was modelled among those who died using mixed-effects models on the time-to-death scale. Results A total of 12,440 adults aged 50 to 105 years were included, with a mean age of 62.1 years (SD 9.6); 5,698 men (45.8%) and 6,742 women (54.2%). Mean baseline FI was 0.17 (SD 0.12), higher in women than men (0.19 vs 0.16; P<0.001). After adjusting, women had a 0.014 higher mean FI than men at baseline (adjusted mean difference; 95%CI 0.008, 0.020), with difference widening over follow-up, increasing from 0.016 at 2 years to 0.029 at 17 years. Analysis of terminal decline found that accumulation of frailty accelerated in the years preceding death; with results suggesting that women reached death with higher frailty than men (difference 0.029; 95%CI 0.009, 0.048). Conclusion Women experienced higher and more rapidly increasing frailty compared to men and carried a greater frailty burden in the years preceding death. These findings underscore the importance of considering sex differences in frailty trajectories when developing healthy ageing strategies that address the life-course vulnerabilities disproportionately driving frailty accumulation in women in low- and middle-income countries.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.1%
2
BMC Geriatrics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
3
Experimental Gerontology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
4
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.2%
5
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
6
Age and Ageing
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
8
Demographic Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Aging Cell
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.2%
11
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
12
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
14
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
15
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
50 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
16
Nature Aging
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Health & Place
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Annals of Epidemiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Current Developments in Nutrition
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
Social Science & Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Public Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
26
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
27
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
28
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
29
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
31 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
30
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%