Correlation Between Clinical Presentation and Brain CT Findings in Acute Dizziness: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Analysis at a Tertiary Referral Center

Background: Dizziness is a frequent presenting complaint in the emergency department (ED), prompting extensive diagnostic evaluation. Non-contrast brain computed tomography (CT) is often utilized to rule out serious central pathologies, but its diagnostic yield is debated, leading to concerns about overuse. This study aimed to identify clinical predictors associated with abnormal brain CT findings in patients with acute dizziness to help refine imaging selection criteria. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 291 consecutive adult patients who presented with new-onset dizziness and underwent a non-contrast brain CT scan at Namazi Hospital, a tertiary referral center, between January 2019 and 2021. Patient data, including demographics, comorbidities, clinical symptoms, and hospital outcomes, were extracted from medical records. Statistical analyses were performed to determine associations between clinical variables and CT findings, with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated. Results: The diagnostic yield of brain CT was low, with a significant majority of scans (72.2%, n=210) revealing no acute pathology. Key clinical factors predicting abnormal CT findings included a history of diabetes mellitus, the presence of ataxic gait, and headache. Conversely, nausea and vomiting were significant predictors of normal findings, being associated with lower odds of central pathology. Conclusion: The diagnostic yield of routine brain CT in patients with acute dizziness is low. However, specific clinical indicators can effectively stratify risk. The presence of focal neurological signs like ataxia, headache, and certain comorbidities such as diabetes should heighten suspicion for central pathology and support the use of neuroimaging. In contrast, isolated vestibular symptoms like nausea and vomiting are associated with a lower probability of abnormal findings. These results could inform the development of clinical decision rules to optimize CT utilization, thereby reducing unnecessary radiation exposure and healthcare costs.