Cardiorenal Outcomes with Finerenone in Patients Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights from a Global Federated Network
Chuang, Y.-C.; Zhong, J.-Y.; Lin, Y.-P.; Tsai, T.-C.; Tu, H.-T.; Chuang, M.-J.; Wang, C.-Y.; Lin, W.-W.; Lee, W.-L.; Liu, T.-J.; Hung, C.-L.; Chao, T.-F.
Show abstract
Background: Finerenone, a non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (nsMRA), improves cardiorenal outcomes in chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, and heart failure. However, its clinical efficacy and safety when initiated early after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain unknown. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX global federated network to identify adult patients with AMI who initiated finerenone within 6 months of the index event. These were compared to a propensity score-matched control group of AMI survivors who did not receive finerenone. Results: After 1:1 propensity score matching, 1,012 patients were included (506 per group; mean age 69 years). The cohort represented a high-risk phenotype with a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes (~84%) and CKD (~80%). Over a 2-year follow-up, finerenone treatment was associated with a lower risk of the composite endpoint of mortality and heart failure (HR 0.644; 95% CI 0.495?0.837; P < 0.001). Notably, finerenone was also associated with a lower risk of progression to ESRD or CKD stage 5 (HR 0.573; 95% CI 0.387?0.851; P = 0.005) and all-cause hospitalization (HR 0.602; 95% CI 0.482?0.751; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the risk of adverse events, including hyperkalemia, hyponatremia, and syncope or hypotension between groups. Conclusion: In this real-world study of high-risk post-AMI patients, early initiation of finerenone was associated with lower risks of composite cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, and renal disease progression, without a significant increase in adverse events. These findings warrant validation in prospective randomized controlled trials.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Arrhythmia and Survival Outcomes among Black and White Patients with a Primary Prevention Defibrillator 96%
- Aptamer Proteomics for Biomarker Discovery in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction 94%
- Effects of catheter-based renal denervation in hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of imaging-free myocardial fibrosis prediction models, association with outcomes, and sample size estimation for phase 3 trials 96%
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 95%
- High Variability of Body Mass Index Independently Associated with Incident Heart Failure 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical presentation, disease course and outcome of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with and without pre-existing cardiac disease – a cohort study across sixteen countries 95%
- Mortality Risk and Treatment Disparities in the Chinese SMuRF-less STEMI Patients: A Nationwide Cohort Study 94%
- Hypoferremia reduces long-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular events after STEMI by averting the myocardial reactive iron storm 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions 96%
- Risk of Cardiovascular Events after Covid-19: a double-cohort study 94%
- Sex-Related Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation with Self-Expanding or Balloon-Expandable Valves: Insights from the OPERA-TAVI Registry 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of Second-line Antihyperglycemic Agents for Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Large-scale, Multinational, Federated Analysis of the LEGEND-T2DM Study 96%
- Lipid-Modulating Agents for Prevention or Treatment of COVID-19 in Randomized Trials 93%
- Antithrombotic Therapy in COVID-19: Systematic Summary of Ongoing or Completed Randomized Trials 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.