Back

Cardiorenal Outcomes with Finerenone in Patients Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights from a Global Federated Network

Chuang, Y.-C.; Zhong, J.-Y.; Lin, Y.-P.; Tsai, T.-C.; Tu, H.-T.; Chuang, M.-J.; Wang, C.-Y.; Lin, W.-W.; Lee, W.-L.; Liu, T.-J.; Hung, C.-L.; Chao, T.-F.

2026-06-29 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.24.26356503 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Finerenone, a non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (nsMRA), improves cardiorenal outcomes in chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, and heart failure. However, its clinical efficacy and safety when initiated early after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain unknown. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX global federated network to identify adult patients with AMI who initiated finerenone within 6 months of the index event. These were compared to a propensity score-matched control group of AMI survivors who did not receive finerenone. Results: After 1:1 propensity score matching, 1,012 patients were included (506 per group; mean age 69 years). The cohort represented a high-risk phenotype with a high prevalence of type 2 diabetes (~84%) and CKD (~80%). Over a 2-year follow-up, finerenone treatment was associated with a lower risk of the composite endpoint of mortality and heart failure (HR 0.644; 95% CI 0.495?0.837; P < 0.001). Notably, finerenone was also associated with a lower risk of progression to ESRD or CKD stage 5 (HR 0.573; 95% CI 0.387?0.851; P = 0.005) and all-cause hospitalization (HR 0.602; 95% CI 0.482?0.751; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the risk of adverse events, including hyperkalemia, hyponatremia, and syncope or hypotension between groups. Conclusion: In this real-world study of high-risk post-AMI patients, early initiation of finerenone was associated with lower risks of composite cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, and renal disease progression, without a significant increase in adverse events. These findings warrant validation in prospective randomized controlled trials.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.