Back

Clinician contributions to disparities in severity of illness trajectories among mechanically ventilated patients

Chesley, C.; Yakusheva, O.; Lu, Y.; Kohn, R.; Belk, A.; Scott, S.; Halpern, S.; Kerlin, M.

2026-06-25 respiratory medicine
10.64898/2026.06.23.26356358 medRxiv
Show abstract

Rationale. Racial disparities in outcomes among patients with acute respiratory failure are well-described, but the contributions of clinicians to these disparities have not been evaluated. Objectives. Among mechanically ventilated patients, we evaluated racial disparities in severity of illness trajectories and adapted value-added modeling to quantify nurse and physician relationships with these disparities. Methods. In a retrospective cohort of mechanically ventilated patients across five hospitals between 2018 and 2022, we used generalized estimating equations to model the change in Laboratory-based Acute Physiology Score version 2 (LAPS) from the start to end of intensive care unit admission ({Delta}LAPS). Consistent with value-added modeling, we randomly allocated the cohort into development and testing partitions, and fit separate multiple linear regression models of {Delta}LAPS using concurrent nurse and physician assignments (determined at 4-hour intervals), patient race, and clinician-race interaction terms as fixed effects. Clinician-specific and clinician-race interaction coefficients were extracted to determine race-specific value-add for each clinician. We defined the race-contextual value-add difference (RCVAD) as a clinician-level measurement of the difference in that clinician's value-add between Black and White patients in their care; a positive RCVAD indicates a more favorable severity of illness trajectory for Black relative to White patients and vice versa. Measurement and Main Results. Among 6,555 distinct patients, 7,247 clinical encounters, 405 nurses, and 70 physicians, Black patients accounted for 2,926 (40%) encounters. Overall, Black patients had significantly less improvement in {Delta}LAPS than White patients (difference in LAPS decline = 2.26 [0.23, 4.29], p=0.029). In the development partition, median nurse RCVAD was -0.10 (interquartile range [IQR]: -1.17, 1.14) with 191 (47%) nurses having a positive RCVAD; median physician RCVAD was -0.18 (IQR: -1.34, 0.56) with 29 (41%) having a positive RCVAD. Conclusions. Black mechanically ventilated patients experience less improvement in severity of illness during intensive care unit admission than White patients. While the majority of physicians and nurses were associated with disparities-exacerbating illness trajectories, many other clinicians were associated with disparities-mitigating trajectories. Future work to understand practices associated with disparities-exacerbating and disparities-mitigating care profiles could inform interventions to reduce disparities overall.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Critical Care Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.6%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.3%
3
Critical Care Explorations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 19%
5.1%
5
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
6
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.4%
8
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Clinical Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.3%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 26%
1.8%
12
CHEST
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
13
Journal of General Internal Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
14
Life
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
15
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
17
BJGP Open
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
20
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Virology Journal
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
JMIR Medical Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
25
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
26
Infection
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
27
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
28
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
29
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%