Back

Computational Decomposition of New Memory Failure in Alzheimer's Disease Through a Hippocampal Cortical Consolidation Bottleneck Model

Zhang, M.; Pan, Y.; Chen, L.

2026-06-24 health informatics
10.64898/2026.06.23.26356309 medRxiv
Show abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is clinically marked by difficulty retaining newly learned information, yet routine memory scores often conflate poor initial encoding with failure to stabilise information after encoding. This ambiguity limits the mechanistic interpretability of cognitive assessment during the transition from mild cognitive impairment to AD. Here we propose a Hippocampal Cortical Consolidation Bottleneck (HCCB) model to computationally separate these two components of new memory failure. The model represents newly presented information as a rapidly formed hippocampal trace and a slowly stabilised cortical trace, predicting a residual bottleneck when delayed recall falls below the level expected from immediate recall. We operationalised this prediction as Consolidation Bottleneck Index*(CBI*), a cognitively normal reference normalised residual index, and evaluated it using Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cognitive and MRI data, with independent dynamical support from OpenNeuro EEG. Simulations showed recent memory vulnerability when hippocampal vulnerability exceeded cortical vulnerability. In ADNI, CBI* increased from cognitively normal participants to mild cognitive impairment nonconverters, reached Alzheimer like levels in mild cognitive impairment converters, and was associated with hippocampal atrophy. CBI* added minimal discrimination beyond established clinical and structural predictors, supporting its role as a mechanistic phenotype rather than a replacement prognostic model. OpenNeuro EEG further showed increased neurodynamic rigidity in AD. Our findings provide a computational framework for quantifying failed stabilisation of newly encoded information in AD progression.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.9%
2
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.1%
4
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
5
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
6
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
7
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
Neurobiology of Aging
107 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.0%
9
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
10
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.7%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.6%
13
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
Brain Informatics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
19
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
20
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.5%
21
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
22
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
23
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
26
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
27
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
28
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
30
Alzheimer's & Dementia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%