Back

A Universal Immune Index (II): A Composite Quantitative Assessment Method and Calculation Tool for Immune Function Based on Multidimensional Routine Laboratory Parameters

zhang, Y.; LI, K.

2026-06-25 allergy and immunology
10.64898/2026.06.22.26356269 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Quantitative assessment of immune function is essential for clinical and health decisions in oncology, post-surgical management, and autoimmune diseases. Existing methods are either too simplistic (single indicators) or too complex and costly for routine use. A standardized, easy-to-operate tool based on routine laboratory parameters is needed for both clinical and health checkup settings. Methods: We propose the Immune Index (II), integrating 9 routine laboratory parameters across three dimensions: humoral immunity (IgG, complement C3, C4), cellular immunity (CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, CD4+/CD8+ ratio), and inflammatory response (CRP, IL-6, systemic immune-inflammation index [SII]). Indicators were normalized using min-max normalization to a 0-100 scale and aggregated with fixed weights (humoral 30%, cellular 40%, inflammatory 30%). The II score ranges from 0 to 100, with a healthy reference range of 50-80. Results: A four-tier grading system was established: >=80 (immune overactivation), 50-80 (immune homeostasis), 35-50 (mild immune suppression), <35 (severe immune deficiency). Validation using 209 cases from published literature showed an AUC of 0.924 (95% CI: 0.87- 0.97) for distinguishing normal from abnormal immune status, with an optimal cutoff of 47.8 (sensitivity 84.8%, specificity 85.9%). II scores were 56.7+/-8.6 (healthy), 43.5+/-8.0 (immunodeficient), and 33.6+/-6.5 (autoimmune), with P<0.001 between all groups. The calculation requires only two steps and can be implemented in Excel or LIS. II can serve as an immune dimension supplement for personal health checkups. Conclusion: The Immune Index provides a simple, standardized, and low-cost tool for quantitative immune function assessment. The fixed-weight design ensures cross-institutional comparability, making it suitable for outpatient clinics, health checkup centers, and primary care settings. Keywords: Immune index; immune function; quantitative assessment; routine laboratory parameters; composite score; min-max normalization

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
20.3%
2
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
20.3%
3
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.4%
4
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
Clinical Immunology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
6
Cytometry Part A
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
9
Journal of Medical Virology
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
10
The Journal of Immunology
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
11
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
12
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
13
Journal of Clinical Virology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
14
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Computational Biology and Chemistry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Rheumatology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
20
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
22
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 28%
1.1%
23
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Pharmaceuticals
34 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
27
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
28
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%