Psychometric Evaluation of the Snakebite Severity Score (SSS) in a Multinational Randomized Clinical Trial
Perez de Souza, J. V.; Nkenguye, W.; Chappell, G.; Platts-Mills, T. F.; Nickenig Vissoci, J. R.; Gerardo, C. J.
Show abstract
Background: Snakebite envenomation (SBE) is a World Health Organization recognized neglected tropical disease (NTD) affecting 1.8 million annually. Currently SBE research lacks standardized, patient-centered outcome measures, hindering comparability and clinical relevance. The Snakebite Severity Score (SSS) is a composite endpoint developed to assess symptom severity across multiple body systems. The present study evaluates the psychometric properties of the SSS using data from the BRAVO Phase 2b clinical trial of varespladib-methyl. Methods: A secondary analysis was conducted using data from the BRAVO clinical trial (NCT04996264), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2b study evaluating varespladib-methyl. Patients aged [≥]5 years with symptomatic SBE were enrolled from emergency departments in India and the US. The SSS and modified versions (6-item and 3-item) were administered at baseline and at multiple follow-up time points: 3, 6, and 9 hours post-envenomation, and on days 2, 3, 7, 14, and 28. Psychometric analyses included descriptive statistics, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for reliability, principal component analysis (PCA) for internal structure, and correlations with patient-reported outcomes (PSFS, PGIC, NPRS) and clinician-rated CGI-I for external validity. Results: Ninety-five participants were analyzed (varespladib: n=45; placebo: n=50). The 6-item SSS demonstrated strong reliability (ICC = 0.8 at Days 7-14) and consistent internal structure across subscores. PCA confirmed multidimensionality, with distinct contributions from local wound, nervous system, hematological, and other subscales. External validity was supported through moderate to strong correlations with PGIC, NPRS, and CGI-I, particularly for applications capturing symptom variation over time (AUC, mean scores). The 6-item SSS captured symptom severity more robustly than the 3-item version. Conclusion: The SSS is a reliable and valid multidimensional composite endpoint for assessing clinical severity in SBE. Applications that integrate symptom change over time demonstrate better external validity and are preferable. Findings support SSS use in clinical research to standardize and improve outcome assessment in SBE.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Can a specific biobehavioral based therapeutic education program lead to changes in pain perception and brain plasticity biomarkers in chronic pain patients? A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial 94%
- Supporting Respiratory Epithelia and Lowering Inflammation to Effectively Treat Common Cold Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial 94%
- Restoration of normal central pain processing following manual therapy in nonspecific chronic neck pain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Smartphone-based infrared thermal imaging for differentiating venomous snakebites from non-venomous and dry bites 93%
- Development of a Core Outcome Measure Instrument; “LeishCOM_LCL”, for Localised Cutaneous Leishmaniasis 92%
- Evaluation of the geographical utility of Eastern Russells viper (Daboia siamensis) antivenom from Thailand and an assessment of its protective effects against venom-induced nephrotoxicity 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical diagnosis of COVID-19: a prompt, feasible, and sensitive diagnostic tool for COVID-19 based on a 1,757-patient cohort (The AndroCoV Clinical Scoring for COVID-19 diagnosis) 92%
- Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Ultrasound Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 91%
- Severe bandemia is not associated with increased risk for adverse events in general pediatric emergency department patients 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Jinhua Qinggan Granules for Nonhospitalized COVID-19 Patients: a Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Controlled Trial 91%
- Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled, clinical trial to study co-administration of Ashwagandha on safety, immunogenicity, and protection with COVID-19 vaccine – A Study Protocol 90%
- Comparing COVID-19 and influenza presentation and trajectory 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.