Food additive exposure associated with reduction in gut microbiota diversity
Singh, R.; McDonald, D.; Knight, R.; Salathe, M.
Show abstract
Consumption of ultra-processed foods is rising globally and has been implicated in inflammation and metabolic dysfunction, yet the impact of specific food additives on the human gut microbiota remains poorly understood. Using dietary data from the Food & You study (approximately 1000 participants in Switzerland), we identified 257 unique additives from 4,119 unique packaged products to quantify each participant's daily additive exposure. Higher exposure to a combination of high intensity sweeteners and sugar polyols, commonly found in low calorie products, was independently associated with reduced gut microbial Shannon diversity (beta = -0.39, p < 0.001), after adjustment for demographics, diet quality, BMI and bowel movement frequency. At a broader level, total additive exposure and fast food consumption were each negatively associated with gut microbial diversity; however, additive exposure remained independently associated and also specifically attenuated the diversity benefits of vegetable rich diets. Furthermore, microbial log ratio signatures linked to additive exposure showed strong negative correlations with Shannon diversity, including emulsifiers and thickeners (r = -0.66) and preservatives and antioxidants (r = -0.56). Integrating additive exposure with healthy dietary components such as HEI, fruits, or vegetables strengthened associations with gut microbial diversity; for example, vegetable linked correlations with Shannon diversity increased from r = 0.52 to r = 0.65 when contrasted against preservative-antioxidant exposure. Concordantly, microbial signatures associated with the sweeteners and sugar polyols additive combination showed depletion of fiber associated commensal taxa, and enrichment of pathways involved in polyol and aromatic compound metabolism. Notably, these associations emerged despite packaged foods representing only approximately 15% of logged dietary intake, underscoring the sensitivity of gut microbial diversity to limited exposure, and demonstrating that without integrating additive and processed-food metrics, one of the largest effect-size phenomena in human gut microbiota diversity would remain undetected.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- 3D mapping of host-parasite-microbiome interactions reveals metabolic determinants of tissue tropism and disease tolerance in Chagas disease 92%
- Persistent DNA damage rewires lipid metabolism and promotes histone hyperacetylation via MYS-1/Tip60. 92%
- Desert Dingo (Canis lupus dingo) genome provides insights into their role in the Australian ecosystem. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A prebiotic diet changes neural correlates of food decision-making in overweight adults: a randomized controlled within-subject cross-over trial 94%
- Diet quality and risk and severity of COVID-19: a prospective cohort study 92%
- Genetic variation at 11q23.1 confers colorectal cancer risk by dysregulation of colonic tuft cell transcriptional activator POU2AF2 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal gut microbial signals are associated with weight loss: insights from a digital therapeutics program 94%
- Short-term Ketogenic Diet Induces a Molecular Response that is Distinct from Dietary Protein Restriction 89%
- The Biochemical Effects of Carotenoids in Orange Carrots on the Colonic Proteome in a Mouse Model of Diet-induced Obesity 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal analysis of genetic and environmental interplay in human metabolic profiles and the implication for metabolic health 93%
- Human reference gut microbiome comprising 5,414 prokaryotic species, including newly assembled genomes from under-represented Asian metagenomes 91%
- Gut Microbiome Predicts Clinically Important Improvement in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.