Back

A pharmacometric grey zone reconciles high metronidazole resistance rates with bismuth quadruple therapy efficacy in Helicobacter pylori

He, C.; Wang, H.; Xu, X.

2026-06-23 gastroenterology
10.64898/2026.06.21.26356170 medRxiv
Show abstract

Summary Background Metronidazole (MET) resistance in Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) exceeds 50-60% globally, yet MET-containing bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) achieves &gt90% eradication in MET-resistant infections. We hypothesise this discordance stems from a structural limitation of two-fold dilution: a pharmacometric grey zone between the 128 and 256 &microg/mL breakpoints where treatable isolates are systematically misclassified as high-level resistance. Methods In a real-world cohort of 4610 treatment-na&iumlve children (2019-2024), checkerboard assays determined the bismuth-MET synergy factor (SF). Population PK/PD modelling simulated gastric MET exposure (AUC<sub&gt0-24</sub&gt/MIC &ge 70) at 1 g, 1&middot5 g and 2 g daily doses, incorporated bismuth SF, and estimated MIC coverage against the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) population distribution. Findings were validated against published adult trials. Findings 56&middot4% (485/860) of isolates were MET-resistant (MIC &gt 8 &microg/mL). At [&le;] 1 g/day MET, BQT offered no advantage over triple therapy for resistant infections. At 1&middot5 g/day, the synergy threshold was surpassed, achieving &gt90% eradication in MET-resistant infections, with efficacy independent of baseline susceptibility status. PK/PD modelling showed 1&middot5 g/day MET plus bismuth (median SF = 8) extended coverage to ~180 &microg/mL. To align modelled coverage with the &gt90% eradication rate, the dominant subpopulation of nominally high-resistant isolates must have a geometric mean MIC well below 256 &microg/mL (centred near 150 &microg/mL), consistent with a mixture of two log-normal subpopulations and confirming systematic upward misclassification by two-fold dilution in the grey zone. Interpretation This grey zone is a structural blind spot of two-fold dilution, not random measurement error. The &plusmn1-dilution reproducibility limit renders the interval inherently unresolvable. We propose a three-tier strategy: omit routine MET susceptibility testing for treatment-na&iumlve patients on optimised BQT; reserve categorical testing for BQT failures; and explore genomic/metabolomic biomarkers beyond MIC paradigms in this enriched population. Funding None. Keywords: Helicobacter pylori; Metronidazole resistance; Bismuth quadruple therapy; Antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling; Pharmacometric grey zone

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Gastroenterology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.1%
2
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.7%
3
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.2%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
6
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 23%
3.9%
8
Gut
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
10
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
11
American Journal of Gastroenterology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
12
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
13
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
14
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.0%
16
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
17
Gut Microbes
70 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
19
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
20
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
21
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
22
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
23
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
24
British Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.9%
26
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
27
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
30
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%