Back

Data-driven gait cycle decomposition based on whole-body coordination dynamics

De luca, M.; Demuru, M.; Gallo, E.; ANGIOLELLI, M.; Tafuri, D.; Sorrentino, G.; Sorrentino, P.; Troisi Lopez, E.

2026-06-19 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.18.732845 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The study of human locomotion has long relied on descriptive frameworks of the gait cycle, which have provided essential insights into the functional phases of walking and their underlying biomechanical demands. While these models remain highly informative, they are largely based on observational analyses and may not fully capture the continuous, global coordination that characterizes human movement. The present study proposes an integrated framework to study whole-body coordination. This framework combines network theory with non-negative matrix factorization (NNMF) to treat gait as a dynamic system of coordinated joint interactions. Using three-dimensional kinematic data from 60 healthy subjects, we constructed a representation of whole-body coordination across time, named "dynamic kinectome". It was then decomposed using NNMF to extract spatial patterns of joint coordination and their corresponding temporal activations, allowing for an interpretable characterization of locomotor organization while preserving physiological meaning. Our analysis extracted six robust, highly consistent, and symmetrical coordination patterns across participants, effectively capturing the primary functional subtasks of locomotion. Rather than challenging classical phase descriptions, these findings enrich them by showing how coordination emerges as a continuous, often proactive process that can extend across conventional phase boundaries and systematically integrates the upper limbs for dynamic stability. Overall, this study provides a holistic, data-driven perspective on human locomotion, offering a promising basis for future investigations in motor control and may contribute to the development of sensitive biomarkers for clinical and rehabilitative applications.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.6%
3
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.7%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.1%
6
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
Sensors
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
9
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
10
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
11
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.3%
12
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
13
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
14
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.9%
16
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
17
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
19
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
20
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
22
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
26
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
27
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
16 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.8%